lil0ps

joined 2 days ago
[–] [email protected] -5 points 1 day ago

Do I? Can you show me where I ‘cheerleaded the wealthy?’

Genuinely, I’m waiting. I assume you are bigoted and you are assuming my opinions, or that you have misconstrued my words with your own bias into something I never said. Ppl bitch not my 2 day old account but then say I’ve been on here long enough to ‘cheerlead the wealthy.’ Can’t be both.

[–] [email protected] -5 points 1 day ago

Most people are cowards. Many live in survival mode. Wealth makes lives so much better that most people have a sell out price. It’s better to expect that others will sell out to wealth than old and altruistic idea that humans ‘shouldn’t’ have a sell out price. It’s personal morals, kind of like only fans. Some people think it’s really bad, some think it’s great. Overall, we allow it to happen because that’s human tendency.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I know you don’t genuinely want to know why conservatives are seen as fiscally conservative (it’s in the name), but I’ll explain. Republicans and conservatives are different things kind of like leftist and liberals are different things. Conservatives are seen as financially conservative they want to encourage family wealth, they want rely on family instead of the gov(can’t afford to lose the family fortune), and they tend towards ‘traditional’ (conservative) jobs/industries like oil and banking (instead of crypto and self driving/EVs, that are more risky for layoffs, closures, crashes and overwork). Republicans are seen as fiscally conservative because they want a smaller government and a smaller government doesn’t need to be funded so much so the taxes don’t need to be raised. The national debt is this black hole of doom that I thought we had all agreed we would just tolerate until the world exploded and I’m personally stunned to see any president try to reduce the national deficit.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

A lot of the nuclear information is declassified. You would be shocked how the gov will declassify something, but make it look restricted so the average person thinks it’s restricted. You can read about the Scorpius project online.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 day ago

Waiting. Can you tell me why Trump had to reverse the DOE security guard layoff? Can you name a clearance level behind Q? So you know what company ran LLNL when they made the first new warhead in 3 decades?

[–] [email protected] -4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I mansplain the state of America nukes to people who don’t even know why America is behind on nukes but still a nuclear leader, not even one intellectually, curious or inquisitive mind in a bunch. This platform isn’t even old enough for bots yet.

[–] [email protected] -5 points 1 day ago

Hard agree. Trump is a good salesman but his weakness is his refusal to play the media. Zelenskyy is a master at media.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Basically anyone who is a fed could have seen from 3 decades away that the gov wants AI for weapons. While Open AI is involved as a government contractor (which introduces new regulations), the Feds have been poaching ‘ML/AI pros from places like Google and meta for the past 5 years. There are a shocking number of ‘super computer’ engineers working at the labs. I disagree that National security is divided among parties. It’s called ‘the mission’ because it’s a big ominous thing beyond laws. I love working with the DOE/DoD because you aren’t allowed to talk about politics at work. Can be fired for it. That’s great! Keeps things way less political.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Well, that’s how unbiased thinking works. Very rarely is there one truly ‘right side’ but most human experiences have sides where both sides have benefits and downfalls. It’s bigots, the hateful and prejudice who think the world is divided into ‘good’ and ‘bad’ people.

view more: next ›