liyunxiao

Right, so if I get a copy of your birth certificate, walk in front of your house after saying you shouldn't exist, and burn your birth certificate you're completely okay and wouldn't think it's a threat against you, right?

If I say 'i hate (insert your race)', and get material that is commonly associated with your local race and culture, and set it on fire in your front yard, you have no problems, right?

So the KKK did nothing wrong, according to your logic.

I'm not saying you really believe that, only a literal bigot would, but that's what you're arguing in order to justify your anti Muslim or anti religious hatred.

I didn't mention Trump, though liberals did elect Trump. Conservative liberalism is still liberalism; Americans shortened it because, well, they can't really handle big words.

As far as the civil rights act that was a median 40 years after the rest of the world... Who cares? Congrats you eventually, after nearly all other western countries did so, adopted a half hearted version of equality that has, 60 years later, failed to make the demographics included equal. Such a big accomplishment. Almost as if you did the bare minimum, reluctantly, and didn't fight the immediate erosion of it.

And you're right, the liberals of the 1930s were more progressive than the liberals of the 2020s in the US... Weimar liberals didn't think twice about providing low cost healthcare, trans gender care, or support for gay marriage and relationships. American liberals (at least the elected officials) didn't support gay marriage until 2014.

Are you? Did you skip history class? Did you just not get taught how Hitler was appointed and why liberals felt he was the moderate choice that more closely aligned with them than the actual left wing people they were using state power to suppress?

Are you running an LLM with basically no tokens?

I addressed your appeal to history, what additional fallacy are you going to present to defend your left wing belief that Hitler is preferable to communism, an idea core to liberalism?

Liberals, the people that appointed Hitler, are not left wing.

No, but you have a long history of claiming people on a website with a peak 40k user base are all bots and paid shills.

So I'm not every account you've ever talked to. There's not a global conspiracy targeting you. It's good you can still admit that in your paranoia.

No matter how much you liberals whine, you're not left wing. The left starts are the abolition of capitalism, as equality and equity cannot exist under capitalism.

As far as the origin of the term.... That's not how language works. It evolves over time. The liberals haven't been included in the left since you people appointed Hitler after instigating more than a decade of institutional violence against communists.

You're not left wing, you're the exclusive reason fascists have ever gained power.

...it's not a part of the discussion. Do keep up if you're going to weigh in. I know English sucks, and it really does, but it's the easiest language to learn the basics of for a reason

If you legitimately think everyone that disagrees with you, over half the planets population, are all paid trolls or bots... Well it's just terrible your country has no mental healthcare you can access without going broke and losing your job.

I sincerely hope you join the world in the 21st century soon. It has to be awful living in the 1950s.

The US' attempt at a color revolution by stealing military weapons and using them to massacre civilians is taught in school, and the many problems that caused some members of the uighur people to visit Afghanistan and come back attempting terrorist actions, as well as the subsequent investment in Xinjiang that has since eliminated the crushing poverty that caused those desperate people to turn to fundamentalist terrorism is also widely and publicly known.

When the US stops thinking their version of reality is correct when they famously run the world's largest and most prolific ministry of truth, then we can talk about censorship. Until then you people are too brainwashed to interact with the majority of the world.

I hope you guys get democracy soon.

It's less "we will never get rich", which is objectively incorrect given China is part of BRICS and was rich long before brics was created, and more, "why the fuck is less than 8% of the world entitled to the wealth of over 60%?"

That's not a common interpretation of those words in that order, which would be fantastic if there were a competition for most unique and obtuse construing of sentences; however whether or not such a contest exists, this isn't a part of it.