mat

joined 5 months ago
[–] mat@zelk.space 1 points 3 weeks ago

@tired_n_bored I don’t rly know, we need people to learn how to use fediverse, not mastodon

[–] mat@zelk.space 1 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

@tired_n_bored they don’t need to know it’s a mastodon instance tbh

[–] mat@zelk.space 1 points 1 month ago

@clot27 atm you could use mastodon client like ivory for your bluesky account through skybridge but idk if we still can

[–] mat@zelk.space 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

@thenexusofprivacy so if I follow your pattern, we can also consider twitter as an instance of the activitypub fediverse as some accounts are crossposting/mirroring their twitter acccount on mastodon (as such as @_formula1_) ?

[–] mat@zelk.space 6 points 4 months ago (3 children)

@thenexusofprivacy to me, as long as bluesky can’t properly communicate and federate with any social network (activitypub apps included) we can’t define it as fediversed but I’m curious to have your opinion

[–] mat@zelk.space -1 points 4 months ago (5 children)

@thenexusofprivacy we can’t tell bluesky is fediverse even though it’s decentralized imo

[–] mat@zelk.space 0 points 4 months ago

@chottomatte federation should be an as invisible as impossible for the fediverse to be mainstream imo

[–] mat@zelk.space 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

@iorale I think the fediverse is ready but only if big companies federates and opt out (unlike threads). the thing is that the fediverse can't be the principal argument to attract users yet, interface and simplicity (such as threads) are the key components to bring users in