maypull

joined 1 year ago
[–] maypull 0 points 11 months ago

there is a lot to unpack there, but i don't see the point. you said you were done so ... leave.

[–] maypull 2 points 11 months ago

I think they are both tools

[–] maypull 0 points 11 months ago (2 children)

I assumed everyone here had a similar level of reading comprehension. that was my mistake. have a nice night.

[–] maypull 0 points 11 months ago (4 children)

my whole comment was a hypothetical. so.... bye.

[–] maypull -1 points 11 months ago

your mockery still doesn't change the facts

[–] maypull -1 points 11 months ago (6 children)

ok. you look up hypothetical, and we can meet back here to discuss!!

[–] maypull -1 points 11 months ago (8 children)

in this hypothtical, those are the other two options. I would know: I wrote the hypothetical

[–] maypull 1 points 11 months ago (2 children)

your mockery doesn't change whether it's a voter suppression tactic

[–] maypull -1 points 11 months ago (10 children)

I wasn't arguing about the definition of genocide. it's a pretty outlandish hypothetical for you to be worried about that.

[–] maypull 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I think we just have different ideas of what voter suppression looks like.

[–] maypull 0 points 11 months ago (23 children)

if on election day, an hour after teh polls open, everyone calls the election for cornel west, and people say "you can vote for one of the genocidal maniacs, but it won't matter. they can't possibly win", no one would characterize that any way except voter suppression.

view more: ‹ prev next ›