mondoman712

joined 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Yeah they're really taking their time with it.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 7 months ago (6 children)

You have to spend billions before laying track. That's true of any high speed rail. They've done a lot of groundwork and built a lot of structures, and they should be laying some track relatively soon.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago (3 children)

  • Merced to Bakersfield is the initial operation segment, that is estimated to cost $28–35 billion, as per your link. This is the cheapest phase that you are referring to.

  • Phase 1 adds the segments to SF and Anaheim. This is projected to cost $130 billion.

  • Phase 2 adds segments to San Diego and Sacramento. These are a long way off and I haven't seen any cost estimates for it, but as you can see it doesn't triple the length of the system.

  • There is no Phase 3 in the official design.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago (5 children)

So where does the $500 billion come from?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago (7 children)

full phase 1 != the IOS. The IOS is predicted to be $28–35 billion. The full phase 1, which is SF and Merced to Anaheim, and also most of the entire network, is predicted to be $128bn (as per your quote).

[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 months ago (9 children)

The IOS is projected to commence revenue service as a self-contained high-speed rail system between 2030-2033, at a cost of $28–35 billion, and will replace current San Joaquins service south of Merced.

From the top of the page you linked. I see no reference to $130b.

The federal government can also fund infrastructure projects in states.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 7 months ago (11 children)

Source on the $500 billion?

And governments don't need to find money to fund capital projects. The US government can print money. They can effectively borrow money against the future economic growth that the project will provide, which is an easy bet with projects like this.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 7 months ago

There's a facebook group for that line, perhaps they could help you: https://www.facebook.com/groups/upbelvideresub/

[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 months ago

The 20mph has had a measurable impact in Wales, and it does lower average speeds even if more people are now driving over the limit. It really should come along with infrastructure changes to reflect the lower limits, but that would take decades and this is something that can be done quickly.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 months ago

Not really surprising from the bbc

[–] [email protected] 10 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Traffic flows best at 20mph. Here's a scientific study that proves it (pdf warning)

[–] [email protected] 8 points 8 months ago

Lower speeds have a huge impact on the pedestrian you hit. There's a big difference between the fatality rates at 30mph Vs 20mph

 

I'd previously assumed that the logo that showed up on the title screens for Moroccanoil was just another state owned oil company putting sponsorship money into random things, but the haircare ad at the end of yesterday's broadcast let me to do some investigating.

It turns out Moroccanoil is an Israeli company and I haven't seen many people talking about the potential conflict of interest here that might explain the EBU's shady behaviour this year.

I did find this article about them from 2015 which links to a video of sales reps from the company partying in what "may be" the occupied west bank. They also do appear on various BDS lists.

There is also this article from The Sun which does connect this to Eurovision this year, but it's from the sun so honestly that just makes the whole thing seem less credible.

Given the lack of information that I've found, I'm wondering what people here think? Do you know anything else about this? Do you think the EBU's actions are related to this sponsorship? Do we even care because their behaviour was shitty whether their motivation was from the sponsorship or more directly political?

 
view more: ‹ prev next ›