monty33

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 days ago

You should look at garmin watches

[–] [email protected] 12 points 3 days ago

Some garmin models check all of those boxes. And the NFC payment doesn't require you to gave you phone with you.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Yes I'm pretty sure I've got it narrowed down to issues with NFS shares from TrueNAS. What I can't figure out is how to fix it. I may do a backup, reinstall truenas, import backup, and see of that fixes it. I'm thinking potentially its an issue from reusing my old installation with the new motherboard, processor, and corresponding hardware.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago (3 children)

I tested that and I get full speeds. Upwards of 40-60mbps compared with the 1mbps I get when downloading to the NFS share

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago (5 children)

OK so I have done some additional testing:

  • Memtest passed
  • Added the NFS share to the new qbittorrent LXC, and the download speed dropped down to where my primary qbt is. So I believe this means it is related to the NFS share.
  • Connected the NAS to a different switch. No change.
  • Tried connecting to the NFS share through a different NIC in TrueNAS. No change.
  • Migrated the qbt lxc to another proxmox node. No change.
  • Created a new NFS share on a different pool on TrueNAS and made that the download directory for qbt. No change.

So I believe I have ruled out memory issues, NIC issues, datapool issues, and switch issues.

The problem is I don't know exactly when this started.

I did change out the motherboard on TrueNAS, and just installed the existing NVMe drives into the new motherboard and booted off of them. I did not install a new TrueNAS OS and restore a backup. Could this be an issue?

Shortly after the motherboard change, I upgraded to Electric Eel.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 days ago

The pool is a mirrored pair of 14TB drives. Pool is 56% full. SMART tests all pass, but the last scrub took over a week which was odd.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 days ago

Good points. I will finish the memtest thats running if only to have something ruled out. After it finishes I will try attaching the NFS share to the new qbt lxc and see if i get the same slow download speeds.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 days ago (8 children)

One other thing I changed recently is the motherboard on the NAS. The new one is DDR5 and I didnt have another machine that takes ddr5 to run the new ram through men test, and I didnt want any downtime so I didnt do it. I just powered down the NAS and started memtest. Do you think a bad stick of ram could be the culprit? At this point in just trying to rule things out

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 days ago

The qbittorrent docker container runs on an LXC. The LXC has 4 cores and 8 GB memory.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 days ago (10 children)

The Jellyfin LXC has 4 core, and the Arr stack w/ qbittorrent LXC also has 4 cores. The containers are running in bridge mode.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 days ago

confirmed all speed limits are off

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (14 children)

Hey pal super helpful follow up questions! Here is where I am:

  • did you run speed tests over protonvpn and is this a paid plan?

Have not run speed tests, but yes it is a paid plan

  • have you tested what your Ubuntu download speed is without VPN or gluetun in the way?

Yes I have tried bypassing gluetun with qbittorrent, and no change to the download speed.

  • have you looked at the peer and tracker info to see what's going on there?

No I have not. What info could I gather here? Same file being downloaded in both qbittorrent instances I've tried.

  • have you tried another torrent client to rule out config issues with qbittorrent?

No but if you read my post, I did try a second instance of qbittorrent that does not use my NAS.

  • do you have QoS rules on your router?

None.

  • what is the NFS server, and how are you mounting it?

TrueNAS is serving the NFS, and the LXCs are mounting it via fstab entry.

From your title it's also hard to understand if you're trying to stream an unfinished torrent or not.

Sorry I was not clear. I am NOT trying to play media that is unfinished downloaded. I am trying to play files I already have, and they are impacted by other files being downloaded on qbittorrent.

edit: formatting

 

I have been having a few issues recently, and I can't quite figure out what is causing this. My setup:

  • gigabit WAN up and down. Run speed tests regularly and get 800+ mbps up and down.
  • opnsense router VM (proxmox) running on a lenovo m920x. Installed an intel 2x10gbe card.
  • Sodola 10gbe switch
  • TrueNAS server (bare metal) w/ 10gbe serving the media files over NFS, stored on a ZFS mirror.
  • Jellyfin LXC
  • debian LXC running the arr stack w/ qbittorrent
  • NVidia Shield w/ ethernet

First issue is extremely slow downloads on qbittorrent. Even if I download an ubuntu iso with hundreds of seeders will sit around 1 mibps. Media downloads with ~10 seeders, I'll sit around 200kibps. Running this through gluetun and protonvpn wireguard with port forwarding enabled and functioning.

Second issue I'm having is if I am downloading anything on qbittorrent, and attempt to play a 4k remux on Jellyfin, it is constantly buffering. If I stop all downloads, immediately the movie plays without issue. 1080 files play without issue all the time.

I tried spinning up a new LXC with qbittorrent, and can download ubuntu isos at 30+ mibps locally and not over NFS.

Any idea what could be causing this? Is this a read/write issue on my TrueNAS server? Networking issuing causing the NFS to be slow? I've run iperf to the TrueNAS and getting 9+gbps.

 

Anyone activate this yet? Is this a River only feature or a broader feature?

 

Will there ever be such a thing? I know that you can use your phone on a mount, but having your phone integrated into your dash screen, steering wheel buttons, etc. Is a big convenience and I also think safer.

Would a drop in replacement be possible? Or would a whole new app need to be developed and integrated into every car manufacturer?

This is one google app that I still heavily rely on, unfortunately. I'm sure they are harvesting everything about me as I drive.

 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ml/post/23767236

 

I just spun up a Nextcloud VM, and I'm trying to decide the best way to manage the data storage.

For context, I'm running it on proxmox and installed it with This script.

Ideally I'd like to keep most of my storage on my NAS. I'm trying to figure out if I should keep the data directory local and add a NAS NFS share as external storage, or just move the whole data directory to an NFS share.

How are you guys handling your Nextcloud storage?

-5
$100k Worth of FUD (www.thisweekinbitcoin.show)
 

Does anyone have experience with Proton Wallet yet? What are the pros and considered you've seen? What's your use case for storing bitcoin there?

 

This Week in Bitcoin is a very informative podcast on the latest news impacting bitcoin. Check it out!

view more: next ›