mr_anny

joined 1 month ago
[–] mr_anny@sopuli.xyz 2 points 4 hours ago

Robocop sai perintäkirjeen..

..ropo capitalilta

[–] mr_anny@sopuli.xyz 1 points 12 hours ago

Tell me how to completely direct transmission in only one direction. Laser?

[–] mr_anny@sopuli.xyz 4 points 13 hours ago

Killall kills only one.

[–] mr_anny@sopuli.xyz 6 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

I think thiss effect tells you something about your bodily functions.

I drink about 20 cups of black coffee daily. No smelly urines.

[–] mr_anny@sopuli.xyz 16 points 16 hours ago

This comnent sums up the internet pretty god damn well.

I'mma steal it. Thanx.

And thanx for good laughs too.

[–] mr_anny@sopuli.xyz 1 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

If the plane emits anything, it can be tracked. Ofcourse this one needs sophisticated tech to track, but it is quite doable.

F-35's play is to hide far and engage from there. Well, what if enemy isn't to be seen from afar? You fly in solitude and do nothing? Or maybe go closer?

Air superiority over contested area can't be achieved without actually entering the area somehow.

[–] mr_anny@sopuli.xyz 1 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

Yes. Still the data has source/end point which is the plane itself. It can be tracked. No need to guess what is the wide spectrum data source in the air moving like a jet.

[–] mr_anny@sopuli.xyz 6 points 22 hours ago (8 children)

Those F-35s are stupid creations.

Their superiority relies on constant data traffic and good means to engage enemy from afar. That data can be followed and it does not even need to be deciphered. The data traffic only needs to exist for anyone to pick it up and follow. Now you have invisible device with visible path. Just stay hidden follow the data trail and strike when close. If the data links is closed, their operability would be lessned quite a lot. And there are means to disrupt or interfere the data.

Okay. They're not stupid creations, but they have their weaknesses which if overlooked will come up as disaster.

And they're expensive and filled with tech you would not want to end up in enemy hands.

[–] mr_anny@sopuli.xyz 6 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (1 children)

One thing that could combat big tech platforms would be one singular fediverse app with somewhat respective name to it.

The problem for mass adoption is scattered ways to connect. People in general want thingsa simple. Like FB is FB every way you want to use it.

Second thing would be to lure idols in fediverse and their flocs would follow.

I saw the frustration in my wife's face when I tried to get her in. I dropped reddit for Lemmy and therefore I use this app called Voyager and I connected it in sopuli.xyz. She was like excuse me what? Then I explained this is my way, you can have bunch of other apps and connect to other instances and you can read posts from other platforms too. She was like excuse me what? Aaaand then there is this Pixelfed, Mastodon, Friendica and and and.. with apps these and these. Week after that she managed to install Voyager, connected it in some instance and read things. She still uses big tech platforms as "there's no one here".

*eYou could be the one for precisely those masses that need it fucking simple. They have made their head dumber with algorithms.

[–] mr_anny@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 day ago

It's onomatopoethic and widely undesrtandable regardless of language.

[–] mr_anny@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 day ago

Chuck Norris did not die. Everybody else did.

[–] mr_anny@sopuli.xyz 4 points 2 days ago

The guy is not a customer, but a product. The customer is the one having the adds.

 

I don't know about anyone else but for me the two yellow ones mounted on wheels look sick AF.

view more: next ›