realcaseyrollins

joined 4 years ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 years ago

Hmm...well if it's so easily configurable that's not too bad. It would be nice if you could configure it in the FE tho, but making it easily editable is a HUGE step in the right direction. Good to know that this is the case, ty

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 years ago (7 children)

Why should all instances by default be forced to ban the same words? That is just preposterous in my view and cannot possibly serve all users properly.

Moderation should be up to the admins, not the code itself. Something is wrong if you cannot properly moderate your space, and you need a computer to do it for you. Either get more admins, or close registrations.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 years ago

Also, I voted yes on both "there's too much censorship" and "the current level is just right" because there is a need for moderated spaces, like this one, it's just that unmoderated spaces aren't possible in the current Lemay code.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 years ago (1 children)

I'm not active here, but I would be if there wasn't hard-coded censorship on the software. It's come a long way since I saw it last. The blacklist has even shrunk, which is a good sign.

But I believe that the ultimate power should be in the hands of admins. If an admin wants to ban naughty words, fine, but it shouldn't be the default, just like whitelist mode isn't the default on Fediverse instances, but it's still an option.

For me, it is about principle. Platforms, especially FOSS ones, need to be ones where people can speak their mind freely. Most people leave Big Tech platforms precisely because of the censorship they perform, but others leave because they don't censor enough. My view: create software that by default does not censor, but can be optimized through settings to censor to a far greater degree than Big Tech can/does. This allows both sides of the aisle to be served in different ways by the same software.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 years ago

Session does run on the Loki protocol tho IIRC and they let people self host and whatnot

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 years ago (4 children)

I can see them trying to block Lenny sometime in the future tho

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 years ago* (last edited 4 years ago) (10 children)

Heh well if you think blocking a small list of words will keep people from saying alt-right things, I can't help ya, buddy.

If you want to prune extremism from a platform just moderate your spaces properly.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 years ago (12 children)

I'm not arguing against moderation, I'm just saying that maybe a communication platform shouldn't have hard coded word bans 🤷🏾‍♂️

I'm not against automated tools for moderation, I actually support them and advocate for that feature to be added to Mastodon and Pleroma. But it should be an easily customize feature disabled by default that allows instances to pick whatever words they want to ban, or to not ban words at all.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 years ago (1 children)

Making my own server is definitely something I'm considering.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 years ago

I feel like being able to say whatever words you want isn't too much to ask for but here we are! 😂

 
view more: ‹ prev next ›