seejur

joined 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

To me the problem is content vs entertainment.

Joe Rogan has no content. He is not an expert, but somehow he is able to make the podcast, populated by morons, enjoyable by it's audience. So if a person has to choose between Rogan, with a pseudoscientist in it, or a PhD, which is extremely prepared but does not know how to present his knowledge (either overcomplicated for the general masses, or plain boring), 90% of the people will watch Rogan.

Going to your LoL: the most successful streamers where not the best players, but the pros who manage to keep the chat entertained.

Another example are university professors: the most knowledgeable are usually not the best teachers, because knowing a subject and presenting it are two completely different skill sets.

That's the sad reality of today online content

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The figure are for the international sale dept. Of course Gazprom as a whole does not have only 600 employees

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

We European would be happy to have you in, but unlike the US, we are not forcing someone to join. If Australia does not want to join, happy to have them in Eurovision only

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago

Chrome is a monopoly by itself already. And forcing Google to sell, only to have Microsoft buying it is actually worse then the current situation.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 5 days ago (2 children)

The Democrats are not incompetent: 90% of their funding come from billionaires. The same breed that funds Republicans, with a slight different flavor on social issues. They do not want anything to do with the "radical" left of AOC, Bernie and similar

[–] [email protected] 28 points 6 days ago (3 children)

This comment is under moderation.

Oh wait this is Lemmy not Reddit. My bad

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago

Property taxes on your first house should not be steep. On your other houses on the other hand...

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago (6 children)

What happens if a NATO country Attack another NATO country?

[–] [email protected] 71 points 1 week ago (49 children)

Next time an american speaks about "muh first amendment", "USA only free speech country in the world" bullshit, show them this

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They have no intention to change or move a little bit left. As mentioned they don't have any sort of remorse for the pain other suffers, only that they got affected. So if they have no intention to change their ideas, what makes you think that there might be some common ground? Sometimes a bad ally is worse than an enemy

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If any of these workers did not vote because they wanted to remain apolitical, they deserve it equally

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 weeks ago

Aka Russia will never be a superpower. Russia history motto is "and somehow, it got worse"

view more: next ›