skilltheamps

Schwalbe Pick-up? Es ist größenabhängig, aber z.B. unser Lastenrad hat hinten 27.5" für 170Kg und vorne 20" für 128Kg, bei einem Fahrradgewicht von 50Kg + Fahrer max. 100Kg + Zuladung max. 60Kg = 210Kg.

Well maybe you youself are too new to recognize some of the appeals ;)

One large advantage with silverblue is, that the whole composition of the OS does not take place on the target machine. That means that all the issues that could arise will not take place on the target machine, and can be dealt with beforehand. In the simple case this could mean just enjoying vanilla silverblue without having to think about possibly borking the machine. In an advanced usecase this could mean for example building the os images in a GitLab CI/CD pipeline (with well working tooling that exists already for docker etc), then having automatic tests in the pipeline ensure that everything important works as expected. And only if the tests pass, the image will be added to the repositorie's image registry, where the target machines will fetch it from automatically and rebase to it.

This covers just the basic cpu instructions, no proprietary extensions, no architecture of additional necessities like a gpu, no proprietary firmare for the gpu or anything else. The instruction set of Arm, x86 or whatever is not a secret though. The freedoms in risc-v are mostly concerning the manufacturers, which can build chips using this instruction set without paying any royalties. From a consumer point of view, that at most means one can at most choose from a more organically grown landscape of risc-v chips. Which in turn bears the risk of ending up in a situation, where all we have is a vast jingle of cluttered proprietary extensions, that make it harder to write libre drivers for than it is for Arm today.

Don't get me wrong, risc-v is absolutely amazing! But in terms of freedomness, it would take a manufacturer to extend the spirit of open hardware to the complete SOC - and the basic instruction set is pretty much the smallest piece in that.

Yes. But the more advanced LLMs get, the less it matters in my opinion. I mean of you have two boxes, one of which is actually intelligent and the other is "just" a very advanced parrot - it doesn't matter, given they produce the same output. I'm sure that already LLMs can surpass some humans, at least at certain disciplines. In a couple years the difference of a parrot-box and something actually intelligent will only merely show at the very fringes of massively complicated tasks. And that is way beyond the capability threshold that allows to do nasty stuff with it, to shed a dystopian light on it.

Weil hier auch Wacker Chemie steht: die Transformation in der Chemieindustrie ist nicht das als was sie sich verkauft. Dazu gabs vor zwei Wochen einen Vortrag am Chaos Communication Congress https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=us2ps12oXZc&

Ah interessant, vielen Dank!

Was ist 2017 passiert?

I think with that OP referenced a city close to where they live

What is green, or open or reclaimed about this? Let alone all of these?

Just recently I listened to a very interesting interview of Brad Collette, the founder of ondsel. You can find it here https://open.spotify.com/episode/2TwCcFWC8VwQ4ctjBTZ0Xd?si=pNjFQOI0RCe0v1MU47mwpg

and here https://shows.acast.com/ohm-podcast/episodes/ep-12-brad-cto-of-ondsel

Yes, if it was as object based as it claims, Get-WmiObject would subtract WmiObject from Get. Instead it is like having all the clutchy drawbacks from being object based without reaping any of the potential bemefits.

If you want anything that actually is object based, just use xon.sh - sane and familiar syntax with insane amounts of power just like that

Also lots of command line tools have a flag to output json, and then you can do everything powershell can