sparkle_matrix_x0x

joined 2 months ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

I don't really like endeavourOS, seems like that it points more towards user friendliness than performance, which is not what I'm aiming to. I will probably install base arch, get familiar with it and then select some packages from either cachy or guarda to improve performance.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

That's what I think I'm going to do, probably the best approach

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

I didn't really think about your last point, in fact a big distro like arch will probably never die, while, just how we saw with arcolinux, these smaller distros with smaller development teasm can die in the future.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I understand, but less packages means it's easier to manage my system. One of the reasons I'm leaning towards arch is because of its minimal approach, so that I can install only what I need.

15
submitted 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

I'm going to switch to arch for my general-purpose laptop, since I feel like kubuntu is not enough for me, I want to try a tiling WM and do some ricing.

I'm still undecided between plain arch or CachyOS, because that optimisation looks promising and I also game on my laptop.

The fact is that CachyOS seems more "bloated" with some unnecessary packages, so what do you suggest me? A simple arch installation, arch using the cachy-linux kernel and its optimisations or a debloated CachyOS install? Thank you all in advance.