thoughts3rased

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

THANK YOU. I've been saying this for ages. I really wouldn't mind even £8 a month for the no ads since I spend a lot of time on YouTube, but I am in no way paying extra for bells and whistles I don't need. I already have Spotify, I don't want to and nor am I going to pay for an extra music service that I just won't use. I'm on an unlimited data plan for god's sake, I don't care about downloading videos.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I think the day an adblocker starts charging people is the day that companies will try to sue them into non-existence with lawsuits they know will fail.

Either that or nobody will pay for it because they're used to getting adblockers for free. They'll just move to another one or maybe one that's FOSS.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (7 children)

To think he would've lived if he didn't act like a total nutcase and rely on alternative medicine...

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Because of the potential fallout that would happen if they did. Apple doesn't want to ban one of their key apps, it would be like banning Facebook. The app ecosystem is a key part of any mobile OS' appeal, it's exactly why the Windows Phone failed. Apple doesn't want to lose users to Android which will have twitter even if it's banned through side loading. It's just too popular of an app, even if it's a complete shit hole.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

Comcast will take the taxpayer money, run a shit 5mbps line to the rural area, charge you out the ass for it and pocket the difference from the subsidies.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Why though? Because when I have a perfectly competent music streaming service already, why do I essentially want to pay double for a redundant music service I won't use? If I could just get the ad free experience for a cheaper price I'd be satisfied, but they add all the bells and whistles on top that I don't care for and don't want to pay for.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

I asked it to do the same and it drew a nutsack:

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Woops, haven't had my third coffee of the day.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

The battery is the most expensive part of the phone

Lol no it's not? This is easy to disprove just by looking at the price of replacement parts. You can't tell me that the battery is more expensive than the processor of the phone.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is like closing a shop to prevent robbers.

Surely the solution is to make the grid they charge off of sustainable then????

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ya see that one where someone's landlord went loopy and cut power to their building because he'd consumed a bunch of conspiracy nut stuff?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

A useless comment by a useless person who's never touched code in their life.

view more: ‹ prev next ›