I like that there's like small chance that it knows...
You sure this is a good idea, my sky-blue Nintendo DS®???
Damn i should've just googled the translation correctly lol. Thank you so much
Can someone please explain the joke. I already saw this like two times and still can't figure it out
I absolutely agree that it should be defined specifically, I'm just can't quite figure out how it can be articulated more clearly. I'll think about it more and then update the post.
I also think the punishment should give a lot of grace, like first a warning and comment removal before any ban.
Yes, indeed. I think ban is justifiable if the person in question caught doing it under every post. Other than that, comment removal and warnings are enough
How would you distinguish between doomers, activists, and truth tellers? Would you just ban them all?
As I said, I think that only blatant doomerism should be removed. If people are just discussing things that's fine.
There’s a lot of crossover between all three.
Yes, there are. But I think activists and "truth-tellers" should have at least some arguments and non-dismissive attitude, which differentiate them from doomers
Hi everyone!
As a mod, I started getting some reports on people commenting doomer stuff under posts. They're not really great, they're demotivating and most importantly not really fit this communities vibe. I'm not fond of them, but I can't go removing comments and banning people left and right, because technically, they not breaking any rules. So I feel that the community discussion is in order.
If we going to implement a rule against doomers, I think it is very important to define the rule clearly, for it not to be too broad. So I propose the phrasing "blatant doomerism". Here are examples:
- Blatant doomerism\doomer trolling (comment gets removed, user banned if spams to many comments like this):
- adequate discussion with some doomerism (nothing gets to be done by mods, discussion in the comments goes as usual)
So, the discussion is welcome. If I missed anything, or even if it's not needed and there should be no change to the rule set, or you have anything to add, feel free to comment.
better tools will never lead to me being able to paint or draw without significant time and effort that i don’t have invested into practice
Not with that attitude...
In all seriousness, yes, yes they are. Maybe you can't paint like the medival masters, but you able to open photoshop and make collages/edits to express your inner world a thousand times more interesting and charming. There are people who draw with a mouse. They are expressing themselves, using generic technology, that is for the most part, available everywhere. Do you really need more?
Or are you just want to speedrun and skip all this boring "effort", "dedication", and just generate away your "very valuable" ideas en-mass for cheap?
Yes it indeed is!!
They're skatin'
cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ml/post/25008155
Rule
94
Why did FediDB stopped updating data for Lemmy (and other software as I can see) after November 2024?
(lemmy.world)
I liked to go to the FediDB to look at the Fediverse statistics (mostly how well is lemmy doing). But I got there today after a somewhat long brake and found out that they stopped updating their graphs for individual software since November 2024. But the "all fediverse" graph is up to date so I kinda confused at this point. Does anyone know what happend? Why they stopped? And do they plan on keeping up to date again sometime in the future?
cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/24268901
Don't give up!
view more: next ›