It's 4 accounts' bets that put Trump's odds at 60, likely being done to influence people's perceptions about Trump's chances. It only took ~$30M to tip the scales to 60, which is a very cheap way to advertise for Trump considering the billionaires who support him. https://www.wsj.com/finance/betting-election-pro-trump-ad74aa71
unipadfox
joined 2 years ago
Of course the creator is going to tout the most morally upstanding use of his app. If it genuinely helps human trafficking victims, then that's another story, but from this quote it just seems like he has some vague hope about it.
Disagree. "Girls" is used colloquially all the time, whereas (broadly speaking) "ladies" is a relatively more formal term which specifically refers to older women.
Yeah, so they can see inside...
The irony of this being in China...
I think you're a lot more likely to die awake than to die asleep
just testing in prod, business as usual
You can't provide PII as input training data to an LLM and expect it to never output it at any point. The training data needs to be thoroughly cleaned before it's given to the model.
Instead, he's given the symbol such a bad reputation that nobody would want to use it
view more: next ›
It only took me 3/4 of a second