Nothing makes the government more efficient than cleaning house on the group responsible for bringing money into the government and which has an ROI of 5.
unmagical
The camera module is thicker than the phone and Samsung doesn't think we want a marginally larger device with a fuck ton more battery and better cameras.
So everything he does is explicitly from you? Got it!
How can something be both "discriminatory" and "anti-American?" Isn't discrimination kinda like our whole fuckin' thing?
This isn't one of those instances where freedom of speech is allowed.
I love how you just reiterated your erroneous point verbatim without clarification.
Be respectful of others.
Not sure what that has to do with this discussion or my comment.
Gonna ignore you now since you don't have an answer to my question.
- I have answered your question in a top level comment; your not liking the answer doesn't mean I haven't answered.
- That's your right as much as it's my right to answer your question as I see fit or to point out the dichotomy of your actions and words.
It seems you don't actually know what freedom of speech is.
Freedom of speech means the government can't get you in trouble for what you say.
Freedom of speech does not mean what you have to say is valuable, relevant, or required to be protected, platformed, or promoted by private capital or individuals. Lemmy instances by and large are not products of governments used to curtail your right to say what you want--they're private entities who's own freedom of speech and association allow them to make a determination about whether you're an acceptable entity to keep around.
If you think you're an acceptable entity to keep around when no one else does, feel free to start your own instance.
Sure it is.
And even if it weren't that doesn't make your comment about you getting butt hurt from someone telling you to be better for seeking out where you can be a bigot any less ironic.
Perhaps you should rephrase your post then to indicate you're actually interested in bigotry affirming instances instead of instances that refrain from being a government entity that controls expression.
They are different.
Pretty much any Lemmy instances I suspect supports freedom of speech. There's not really any evidence that admins are colluding with the feds to control what you say.
What may be happening is admins deciding of their own volition to not platform certain types of comments. Notably that doesn't stop you or anyone else from saying whatever; it just means you gotta do it somewhere else, like your own instance.
This is the most ironic comment ever.
What's the alternative? You want me to invite all customers to our company Slack? If I need them to sign something I can contact them how?
In truth we actually need more services like email, no central authority, a multitude of nodes all connecting to each other, any one can stand up an instance and control access and content... Hey wait a minute!