whoszycher

Local ai models can help against basic stylometry, but they're not a silver bullet. Advanced stylometry doesn't just analyze wording - it looks at sentence structure, punctuation habits, even typing cadence. If you just run text through an AI rewriter without changing behavioral patterns, you're still traceable.

AI can be a tool, but relying on it blindly just shifts your fingerprint rather than erasing it.

Hey, I just added table of contents, you can even look at github commits (https://github.com/whos-zycher/opsec-guide/commits/main/)

Ill check his work for sure!

youre welcome!

Hey, thanks for feedback! I will rewrite it a bit - expand the threat model and maybe will add some security "level" thing.

good catch! Will change it.

Hey, appreciate the review! You're absolutely right - stylometry isnt bulletproof, but its practical threat lies in correlation rather than precision. Intelligence agencies dont need 100% certainty - just enough probability to justify further surveillance. And with modern AI driven linguistic analysis, even "imperfect" stylometry becomes a powerful profiling tool.

Good point on tor traffic obfuscation. Random background activity helps break traffic patterns, but it's important not to tunnel everything through tor - that just makes correlation attacks easier. Using monero syncing, onion services, and intermittent activity as cover noise is a solid approach, but layering it with non-tor traffic is key.

I'm Curious are you designing your lesson plan for general opsec education, or is it for a more specific field?

Hi thanks again! Can you expand what you mean by "it could use a few edit passes to get things condensed into fewer categories" and "I felt I was reading the same advice in multiple contexts". Would love to fix it.

Thanks! Hope it will help you sharing the knowledge, good luck!

Thanks! Take your time and share your opinion after reading.

thanks for the feedback! I will add these things, appreciate it bro.