i wanted to learn how to do a certain knot once, and tiktok has short to-the-point videos, while youtube was filled with 10+minutes videos with long introductions, sponsors, long speeches on why you might want to know that knot,...
zeca
joined 4 months ago
i struggle to see how this problem transfers to fake news regulation
transparency is precisely what can make regulations not be censorship, or I should hope so.
of course, but its easier said than done
the whole world depends on doing business with china
When a judge decides to convict someone of murder, we all know they might be wrong. The judge is not entitled to decide what objective reality is, he just decides how the judiciary system sees and treats the situation, as someone has to do it.
The same thing should be applied to fake news, which is sharing (dis)information with the false appearance of some verified news piece to influence people into making certain decisions.
Of course, there's a big potential for censorship in how we treat fake news. So this treatment should follow clear objective criteria and be absolutely transparent.
who knows... but the us has softer means to pressure europe
Pointing that A is like B regarding the aspect X is often treated as a "comparison" between A and B, but it doesnt imply that A is as great, as important, or as bad as B. It doesnt imply that A is like B in any way other than in the aspect X.
Why not focus on the point that is being made instead of freaking out over the angles from which the analogy breaks down. Every analogy breaks down from some angle.
thats different from fake news, still
who is talking about thought crime? spreading fake news can be dangerous in a way that results in actual deaths.
i would guess that people that deactivate js are fine not using google for search