zephyreks

joined 2 years ago
[–] zephyreks 2 points 1 year ago

If the government could step in and just build housing instead of adopting neoliberal bullshit, that would be great thanks.

[–] zephyreks 2 points 1 year ago

If we're subsidizing O&G so much, why don't we just nationalize?

[–] zephyreks 2 points 1 year ago

Neoliberal policy is fucked. It's rather telling that China's economic environment is more conducive to startups and innovation than Canada's.

[–] zephyreks 5 points 1 year ago

Canada would operate perfectly fine with nationalized airlines, telecoms, and O&G. These are established industries that don't need market effects to grow or remain profitable.

The only reason we don't is because we're fucking idiots beholden to capitalism.

[–] zephyreks 1 points 1 year ago

One day I aspire to have as much influence on global politics as Adrian Zenz.

[–] zephyreks 1 points 1 year ago

The CRTC can go fuck itself.

[–] zephyreks 4 points 1 year ago

Jacobin is pretty reliable lol

[–] zephyreks 3 points 1 year ago

Canada was known for helping to keep the peace and deliver humanitarian aid in the past.

Now? Well...

[–] zephyreks 2 points 1 year ago

We have fucking NAFTA and we could do so much economic development to export GHG emissions reductions to the US. The green tech industry is a massive employer and one of the biggest drivers of economic growth in China today, and we literally have a captive market that we can exploit to get the same economic growth driver in Canada.

IMO, reducing our top-line emissions is a lost cause. More than 80% of our electricity comes from clean sources. More than 50% of our emissions comes from O&G and transportation.

[–] zephyreks 3 points 1 year ago

But have you considered that white protestors in the Freedom Convoy can't be Hamas because they're white?

[–] zephyreks 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Frankly, I think Canada would have a much greater impact on emissions if we put our highly-educated workforce towards developing clean technologies for export to the US. That's what we should be working on, because we're already operating in that weird part of the climate curve where it takes disproportionate investment to get any return in terms of GHGe.

If BYD opened an EV plant in Canada for export of $10k EVs to North American markets, we could wipe so may ICE vehicles off the roads across North America.

[–] zephyreks 3 points 1 year ago (12 children)

China's a leader in terms of actually hitting their emissions targets (they're hitting peak oil earlier than expected, for example), but they aren't able to use the natural gas crutch to drive down "emissions."

Methane leaks absolutely destroy any GHGe advantage natural gas has in the short term, but it's something that's completely forgotten in emissions reporting. If you adjust for natural gas' methane footprint, the GHGe reductions in the West start looking really depressing.

 

Currently UBC has a number of bike lanes that feed into campus. These include the lanes on Wesbrook Mall, East Mall, and University Boulevard. However, they're all basically just paint on the road.

UBC is surrounded by two key areas of density: Wesbrook Village (accessible by Wesbrook Mall and East Mall with a 7 minute bike) and Point Grey Village (accessible by University Boulevard with an 11 minute bike). This is an ideal setup for improving bike infrastructure, especially for students.

Currently, there's a decent route on the pedestrian walkway in between the big sports fields (between Wesbrook and East Mall). However, it terminates before entering the area of the university that actually has buildings. This makes the route between Wesbrook Village and UBC doable, but more challenging than it needs to me. A straight shot up Wesbrook Mall would directly connect Wesbrook Village with the Bus Loop for e.g. trips along the 99 B-Line. Meanwhile, a straight shot up from East Mall would bring people directly to the heart of campus. Currently, these roads have pretty sketchy bike lanes that discourage biking.

Along University Blvd, a similar story holds. The road is actually really nice (even for recreational riding), but the infrastructure isn't there for it.

What I'd like to see is for actual separated bike lanes along these corridors. Given UBC's goals of sustainability (and just the general benefits of micromobility for students), this should be a no-brainer.

 

The Vancouver 2030 bid was killed by the BC government back in late 2022. It was expected to cost about $1.2 billion in direct costs (38.5 billion for Beijing, 12.9 billion for Pyeongchang, 50 billion for Sochi, 7.7 billion for last Vancouver).

Vancouver already has most of the sports-related infrastructure built. It would facilitate the construction of more density in Olympic Villages, which could help ease the housing crisis. It would motivate the development of better public transportation and would bring attention to the BC interior through Sun Peaks in Kamloops. It would also drive more hotel development in Vancouver, which is already severely lacking in hotels.

Vancouver is uniquely well-suited for an Olympic bid given it already has the infrastructure in place. Such an event could help drive economic growth and stimulate job creation without paying for the excessive costs of having to build everything from scratch. Instead, Vancouver can focus on important projects such as housing development, transportation, and social welfare under the guise of it being Olympic development.

view more: ‹ prev next ›