Highlights from this Washington Post story and interview, mostly about The Bridges of Madison County but also a little about his new show The Connector:
Brown agreed to collaborate with Marsha Norman and director Bartlett Sher to build a show around that central conflict — and to take some liberties with the rest of the text. “I will continue to say it’s not a very well-written book,” Brown says. “A lot of the places that the book focuses its energies just seemed bizarre. But what was very powerful about it was this idea about what it means to be in the middle age of your life and to reach a sort of crossroads.”
Q: The score to “The Bridges of Madison County” is often lush and operatic, but also folksy and fast-paced. How do you balance a range of eclectic sounds with tonal consistency? A: I think I’m very aware of setting. In the case of “The Bridges of Madison County,” the world was pretty easy for me to diagram because it’s Iowa in the early ’60s. Then I was able to add to it these two people who don’t belong in Iowa in the ‘60s. Francesca comes from Italy, so I thought to use Neapolitan folk song and a little bit of opera. It’s more art song than opera, but that idea of real Italian art music. Then we have Robert, who also doesn’t belong there, and he foreshadows music of 10 years to come. Then, hopefully, I’m a strong enough musician and a resourceful enough composer that once I have that information, I can start combining chemicals in fun ways and seeing what gets combustible.
I value in the work I do a certain kind of ambiguity and a certain kind of ambivalence. Those are qualities that are very resonant to me personally. But I don’t think the Broadway musical as a rule traffics in ambiguity and ambivalence. Broadway audiences are trained on certainties. They are trained on absolutes. They are trained on big declarative statements. In “The Bridges of Madison County,” we just didn’t make big declarative statements. It’s a show that talks about really complex emotions and talks about them in a very real way, and I’m not sure that the commercial audience of 2014 was really ready to hear that the way that we wanted to say it.
When I talk about that thing about ambivalence and ambiguity, I’m not only talking about it on a verbal level. There is a lot in my music that I deliberately leave open not just to interpretation but, really, I like to leave space for the audience to make a decision about what they feel about something. If all you’re doing is living in a world of major and minor chords, the music tells you what you’re supposed to say all the time and tells you what you’re supposed to feel. I think I left enough space in “Parade,” in “Songs for a New World,” even in “13,” that those shows get to be filled with the era that the audience sees them.
I very much like being the elder statesman, but I worry sometimes that what I pass on is actually so far out of fashion that it’s not entirely valuable to the people I’m mentoring. But I still so much value a particular kind of musical storytelling that I just keep trying to keep that tradition alive and pass that word on.
Q: Let’s discuss your new work. What can you say about “The Connector”? A: “The Connector” is, in a lot of ways, a very unconventional musical and a very dangerous musical. We in the audience aren’t entirely sure who we’re supposed to believe at any point throughout the show. I think there’s a very obvious political element to that, but there’s also, to me, a very powerful personal element to that. It’s just this sense of, “What do we trust about people? What do we trust about the stories that they tell us?” There’s a lot about the show that is very explosive, in a way, because it takes an audience to certain places and then asks the audience to make some decisions about what they saw.