this post was submitted on 24 Mar 2021
7 points (70.6% liked)
Open Source
33228 readers
170 users here now
All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!
Useful Links
- Open Source Initiative
- Free Software Foundation
- Electronic Frontier Foundation
- Software Freedom Conservancy
- It's FOSS
- Android FOSS Apps Megathread
Rules
- Posts must be relevant to the open source ideology
- No NSFW content
- No hate speech, bigotry, etc
Related Communities
Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Maybe the intention is good (the links to primary sources definitely help) but this sort of emotional counterattack is what we need to rise above. Personally, I would like to see the exploitative profit motives of the “open source” movement, well documented in dot com, expounded rather than see personal attacks on individuals.
Maybe call out problem organisations like Microsoft, Google, corporations taking over OSM, conflict of interest on paid sponsorship of open source.
Most people here are basically good and using sound bytes instead of extended trends which benefit corporations and shareholders is going to prolong the process of healing the soul of a long since sold out technology industry where few voices remain to keep profits, IPOs, acquisitions, and control via surveillance in check.
Are you saying there isn't a misogyny/gender/whatever problem in tech, particularly in the (f)oss world?
To me, the ideology stuff is related, but not really what I'm mad about. For sure it's important to establish that the letter to the fsf is cynical, but the real relevant information here to me is that all these shitlords that we've canonized fucking suck.
If you write a deep dive into osi/fsf ideological differences I'd definitely link to it, it's the thinnest part of my post.
What I'm saying is this: