this post was submitted on 12 Oct 2024
638 points (73.5% liked)

Political Memes

8596 readers
3942 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 16 points 8 months ago (5 children)

If Kamala looses: All of the blame gets put on third party voters for not "voting hard enough" (especially if she wins the popular vote and looses in the electoral college). Absolutely none of the blame gets put on her supporting genocide, her vague positions, the fact that her campaign page contains very little about her views or policies, her support of fracking, her general support of oil and gas, her support of genocide, and her support for imperialism. Of course that could all be incorrect but Kamala refuses to dispute those claims.

If Kamala wins: She will do basically nothing, compromise with the Republicans, allow states to ban abortion, allow states to restrict womens rights, allow states to ban trans healthcare, generally allow the far-right to do whatever they want, and continue to fund genocide. When all of this happens third party voters will be blamed for "not voting hard enough" and Kamala will take no responsibility whatever.

Regardless of outcome the next election: The Democrat candidate will be even more right wing because leftists didn't "vote hard enough", they will be even more bipartisan and even less progressive. All of the Liberals will demand everyone vote for this candidate yet the candidate will make no attempt to implement any popular policy. Americas rapid decline into fascism will continue and nobody in power will do anything to stop it.

Once again I ask the question what harm is reduced by "harm reduction"? If anything a more accurate term would be slowing down fascism. But what Liberals refuse to answer is what practical purpose is there to slowing down fascism? Congratulations you get maybe a few extra decades from fascism but then what? Clearly Liberals are buying their time but what exactly are they buying their time for? What is the grand strategy? We've already seen the Democratic Candidate clearly use fascist rhetoric, how long is it until these compromise candidates compromise the rights of minorities? How long until they compromise on Fascism? I would vote "harm reduction" if I knew that at the end of it all theres a plan to eventually fight back but I dont think there is one. I think the Liberal plan is to keep doing "harm reduction" indefinitely, however even if you're a hardcore liberal you have to acknowledge thats a fundamentally unsustainable plan.

TLDR: The only people responsible for Democrats not getting elected are the Democrats themselves and their corporate sponsors who hold them back from instituting popular policy, I get its easy to pin the blame on some group but fundamentally thats little more then a logical fallacy.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago

"loses" not "looses"

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

It's crazy how if I vote third party, or not at all I am both voting for Harris and for Trump, depending on who you ask.

My theory, and it is just a theory, is that Trump wins the electoral college vote, but Kamala wins the popular vote by a wide enough margin that by the next election, if there is one, they start to abolish the electoral college. Maybe then a third party candidate could actually make some changes.

I think the fact that Walz spoke out against the ec shows that even he thinks this is a likely outcome.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago

Unlikely, both parties love the electoral college because it destroys any chance of a third party victory.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

One of Trump's goals is to "crack down" (aka ban) protests. So let's get Kamala elected first, and then you can bust out the molotovs or whatever the plan is, please.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Biden has literally cracked down on protests, why wouldn't Kamala Harris do the same?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Which protests? I hadn't heard about this

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Have you not been paying attention to the Palestine protests?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago

Apparently not. I read about college campuses strong-arming protests, but not about federal action.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

What type of Nostradumbassery is this? You have no clue what Harris is or is not going to do. What YOU are doing however, is predicting her behavior in such a way that it conveniently falls within the boundaries of some ideological fantasy of yours that involves you as the hero, chanting

“i tOLd yOu so!”

to anyone dumb enough to listen.

None of what you said is even remotely accurate or based in any semblance of reality in which it could even be challenged properly. The only thing to do at this point is to simply dismiss it as nonsense. .

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

I said that myself, however if Kamala refuses to officially document any of her positions then I think its fair to go by her interviews and statements. Im her public appearances she has expressed support for Israel, publicly abandoned anti-fracking while supporting "energy independence", and made it very clear that she would compromise all of her positions in the name of "bipartisanship".

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Okay…. Cool. Because Trump will be SO much better on these issues.

Man. I really wish people understood how this shit works.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Strawman argument, critiquing your favorite corporate sponsored puppet doesn't mean I support the other guy.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

You’re getting one or the other. Only, one hates women, abhors the LGBTQ+ and intends to revoke many of their rights, has threatened to use the military against American citizens, will bring back concentration camps, is a convicted rapist, and a 34 time convicted felon, will enact Project 2025, is easily bought out by Christian fundamentalists and Russia, and has sad that he will help Israel “finish the job.”

He is going to turn Palestine into a crater. So stop pretending this is about them when you know this. He will be worse. Provenly worse.

So let’s talk about being a puppet mmmmkay??

Because as we all know, Shill Stein’s stings were made in Russia and Cornell West’s masters won’t even take him out of his box.

You’ve got no options other than to keep the bad one out. And if you’re going to respond with “bUt tHeY aRe bOtH bAd!” I’m going to assume you can’t tell the difference between a speck of dirt in your glass full of water, and glass full of raw sewage, and just end this right here.