this post was submitted on 09 Dec 2024
658 points (98.2% liked)

Greentext

4959 readers
2492 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 30 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Yeah even first cousins are actually not that bad, biologically speaking, if it's only done for one (or probably even two?) generation.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yup, and AFAIK, it's legal in some areas to have kids with your first cousin.

[–] Revan343 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Probably legal in more places than it's illegal

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

It is, in fact, legal more places than not. Cousin marriage was extremely common for thousands of years. It only really started to drop off when people started owning cars and could meet people from further away. Most places still haven't changed their laws because the cultural change was so recent, and because it's low risk enough that it's not a serious concern if it's just once in a while rather than, say, medieval European royalty shenanigans.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

AFAIK the risk is about the same as having a kid after 40.