this post was submitted on 14 Mar 2023
6 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37991 readers
213 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago (2 children)

probably not, but is a very powerful weapon for it

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

@altair222 @realcaseyrollins I think ChatGPT is peak of diminishing returns of disinformation. Because it is not quality or quantity that matters though, there are different forces at play.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I would like an elaboration on your first sentence. Genuine curiousity, i want to understand your point.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago (2 children)

@altair222 disinformation does not live or die on quality or quantity - it reflects on people's instinctive fears. It does not really matter who generates it or how much of it is around. This doesn't add anything new to tool kit.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I do understand what you mean. My instintive reaction to the proposition that it doesnt matter of the quantity of the disinformation is to disagree. But i do not have warranted argument against it nor the health to study it currently. Do pardon me for breaking the conversation here, I appreciate the good faith nature of it.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago

@altair222 all is fine, I don't have strength to explain myself fully as well, it is something instinctively - pun intended - feel :) I certainly do understand worries about this angle very much. In fact, I am more worried about sound deep fakes. That stuff will get out of hand pretty fast 😳

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

@altair222 thus ChatGPT as useless text generation tool does not expand disinformation that much. For better or worse. In my humble opinion, of course.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

@altair222 Ah I see...because of its capabilities for mass-producing fake news, that does make sense