this post was submitted on 03 Jan 2025
1056 points (98.8% liked)

Greentext

5300 readers
1151 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 month ago (15 children)

Europe took a long stroll in that direction too, but there are some major differences. First, most of their cities were established before cars. Second, they're making more of an active attempt (in some areas) to be walkable again.

In short, in America 75 years is a long time. In Europe, 75 miles (120km) is a long way.

[–] [email protected] 52 points 1 month ago (12 children)

First, most of their cities were established before cars.

That's true for America too, and isn't an excuse. American cities were not built for cars; they were demolished for cars!

For example, downtown Houston, TX in 1957:

vs downtown Houston, TX in 1978:

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 month ago (9 children)

Are those the same location? I can't see any common landmarks

[–] yimby 8 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Same location, look for the tall white tower with the vertical stripes and balconies, which is in the middle of the bottom photo. Top photo is slightly more zoomed out.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Forgive me, I'm gonna need some help here

[–] AFallingAnvil 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Center of the picture,the building at the top of the color picture seems to be the same one as is found 5 or six buildings north west of the building in the center of the picture in black and white

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

I'm still not quite seeing it

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I would bother with these images tbh since the bottom one is clearly cutting out an unknown amount of the built-up centre...

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Sorry about that; these were just random images of the right place/times from a low-effort web search. I remember seeing a side-by-side comparison somebody made that was better, but I couldn't find it again. (I could only find side-by-sides of 1978 vs 2011, when they started removing the parking lots and filling it back in.)

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

Fair enough, but it's hard to tell unless the comparative images are from sufficiently-similar angles

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)