this post was submitted on 12 Jan 2025
7 points (88.9% liked)
Cricket
260 readers
9 users here now
Upcoming fixtures:
Men's Ashes
| Date | Match | Result | |
|
|
| | 16th June | 1st Test | AUS by 2 wickets | | 28th June | 2nd Test | AUS by 43 runs | | 6th July | 3rd Test | ENG by 3 wickets | | 19th July | 4th Test | Draw | | 27th July | 5th Test | |
Women's Ashes
| Date | Match | Result | |
|
|
| | 22nd June | Only Test | AUS by 89 runs | | 2nd July | First T20I | AUS by 4 wickets | | 6th July | Second T20I | ENG by 3 runs | | 9th July | Third T20I | ENG by 5 wickets | | 12th July | First ODI | ENG by 2 wickets | | 16th July | Second ODI | AUS by 3 runs | | 18th July | Third ODI | ENG by 69 runs (DLS) |
Series drawn - AUS retain the Ashes
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Usually with someone's action being illegal, they're talking about chucking. You can have a bent arm, as long as it stays bent. If it straightens by more than 15 degrees, that's an illegal bowling action. The article itself, frustratingly, shows no footage of her allegedly illegal bowling, so I had to go look up her bowling in other games on YouTube. Came across this video first.
Here's her arm as it reaches the horizontal:
Just eyeballing it with a protractor on my other monitor, that does look about 15 degrees. And she appears to straighten her arm fully by the release. That would mean it's very close to illegal.
So does action just mean bowling?
The headline says "bowling action". It's referring to the action of her bowling being (allegedly) illegal.