this post was submitted on 12 Jan 2025
7 points (88.9% liked)

Cricket

260 readers
9 users here now

Upcoming fixtures:

Men's Ashes

| Date | Match | Result | |


|


|


| | 16th June | 1st Test | AUS by 2 wickets | | 28th June | 2nd Test | AUS by 43 runs | | 6th July | 3rd Test | ENG by 3 wickets | | 19th July | 4th Test | Draw | | 27th July | 5th Test | |

Women's Ashes

| Date | Match | Result | |


|


|


| | 22nd June | Only Test | AUS by 89 runs | | 2nd July | First T20I | AUS by 4 wickets | | 6th July | Second T20I | ENG by 3 runs | | 9th July | Third T20I | ENG by 5 wickets | | 12th July | First ODI | ENG by 2 wickets | | 16th July | Second ODI | AUS by 3 runs | | 18th July | Third ODI | ENG by 69 runs (DLS) |

Series drawn - AUS retain the Ashes

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I have been following cricket a few YEARS now and I have no clue what they are referring to as "her action" any insight

all 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

While I agree that India is the poster child for that sunflower meme when it comes to the actions of International players vs their own, I think they're off the hook for this one.

Ireland was playing India in India. Maguire was reported by match officials. For an international match like this, those officials would not have been Indian.

Hopefully she'll either be cleared, or need to make a minor adjustment to her bowling style. I don't think anyone is suggesting she's bowling in bad faith.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Usually with someone's action being illegal, they're talking about chucking. You can have a bent arm, as long as it stays bent. If it straightens by more than 15 degrees, that's an illegal bowling action. The article itself, frustratingly, shows no footage of her allegedly illegal bowling, so I had to go look up her bowling in other games on YouTube. Came across this video first.

Here's her arm as it reaches the horizontal:

Just eyeballing it with a protractor on my other monitor, that does look about 15 degrees. And she appears to straighten her arm fully by the release. That would mean it's very close to illegal.

[–] n7gifmdn 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

So does action just mean bowling?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

The headline says "bowling action". It's referring to the action of her bowling being (allegedly) illegal.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Couldn't easily find out exactly but broadly speaking it means that there is suspicion that her bowling 'action' isn't legal, probably that she isn't fully extending her arm.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

"The ICC defines an illegal bowling action as when a player's elbow extends more than 15 degrees between the point when their arm reaches horizontal and when the ball is released."

Cricket Europe article