this post was submitted on 13 Jan 2025
593 points (97.4% liked)

World News

40039 readers
3579 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Nobel Peace Prize winner Malala Yousafzai condemned the Taliban’s treatment of women at a Pakistan summit on girls’ education in Muslim communities, stating, "The Taliban do not see women as human beings."

She criticized their policies banning Afghan girls from education and work as "gender apartheid" and un-Islamic.

Afghanistan is the only country banning education for girls beyond grade six, affecting 1.5 million girls.

Malala urged Muslim leaders to challenge these practices and advocate for girls' education globally.

The Taliban declined to attend or comment.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

Their self-claimed right to religious jihad?

Their right to resist colonial oppression, yes.

but i disagree on violent means (jihad and by establishing a state).

How else do you want them to obtain human rights? Because anyone paying attention can tell that Israel will not give them any unless forced to. The Palestinian nonviolent resistance project ended up as the monstrosity known as the Palestinian Authority. Israel actively killed the only major peaceful resistance group in Palestine; what do you expect Palestinians to do?

Their end goal is to jihad Israel until they are gone, wiped off the earth.

Yes, and? Nelson Mandela's ANC fought until the Apartheid was wiped off the face off the Earth too.

We'll just assume the Jews will be safe, I guess?

I mean I guess yeah. How that'll work out will depend on what form the conclusion of this conflict takes, but colonial peoples do tend to face this problem when their rule ends.

but I don't want the world to lose the Jewish people

Okay and? Even if the genocide you're assuming will happen was likely (which it isn't), why is the hypothetical genocide of Jews more important than the real, ongoing genocide of Palestinians?

[–] [email protected] -2 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

If First Nations Americas started an intifada like on oct 7 against my neighbors, would you disagree with their strategy and disavow the people who claimed responsibility, or would you defend them?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

You haven't answered my question: What do you expect Palestinians to do?

If First Nations Americas started an intifada like on oct 7 against my neighbors, would you disagree with their strategy and disavow the people who claimed responsibility, or would you defend them?

First Oct 7th wasn't an Intifada, but that aside: Native Americans got human rights via the Civil Rights Act; they don't live in Apartheid and they aren't being expelled from their lands. I sure wouldn't blame them for rioting though.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Neither would I. I wouldn't blame them for wanting their land back either with violence. I just would never condone that level of violence no matter the reason, not on innocent life, even innocent colonizers like my neighbors are.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago

Oh that's what you're talking about. You should say that sooner. Anyway you should note that October 7th had clear military goals (66% of Israeli casualties were combatants); nobody here is supporting the actual killing civilians part. Hell, I don't think there are any straight up Hamas supporters here specifically because they're too willy nilly about killing civilians (and because of the whole theocratic dictatorship thing).

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)