this post was submitted on 17 Jan 2025
520 points (93.6% liked)

Pleasant Politics

286 readers
2 users here now

Politics without the jerks.

This community is watched over by a ruthless robot moderator to keep out bad actors. I don't know if it will work. Read [email protected] for a full explanation. The short version is don't be a net negative to the community and you can post here.

Rules

Post political news, your own opinions, or discussion. Anything goes.

All posts must follow the slrpnk sitewide rules.

No personal attacks, no bigotry, no spam. Those will get a manual temporary ban.

founded 7 months ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 59 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)
[–] [email protected] 22 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I don't love being spied on and shit but that's a pretty basic requirement. You can probs just call people on the app.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 week ago (2 children)

How is it a basic requirement? No apps should be able to make and manage phone calls apart from your caller app. Even WhatsApp does not need this, and apps that use cellular calling can just open the phone number in the caller app, as they do when e.g. you click on a number in chrome.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 week ago

Whatsapp does in fact need this to make calls

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Basic as in most apps from the app store has that requiremnt

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That's crazy. Wasn't like this even 5 years ago NGL.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Im not disagreeing that the level of privlage escelation is insane and beyond the pale, it is. I am merely pointing out that singling out one app for requesting this promission when thus has become the industry standard is, at best uninformed and at worst feels like your trying to hide something

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Honestly I had no idea this was an industry standard, this is the only app I've seen in the past 10 years which requested such a permission. The last one was "Siri" for Android 2.3.3 Gingerbread off Android Market, and it stole 15 RUB from me.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Literally just let's calls interrupt our manage focus state.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Never had a problem receiving a call while in sync

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago

Sync doesnt take full screen control with audio and video so it's quite a bit different

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Android's fucked up permissions scheme makes even a flashlight app look like horrible spyware.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I have never once seen a robust permission model be easy to use or explain to folks who don't care.

Do you have a suggested alternative that's going to keep privacy and security advocates happy, while being easier to use?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago

But in this case it doesn't apply, and you don't actually need the camera permissions to enable the flashlight and haven't for a very long time.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

pretty sure thats so you can answer phone calls while the app is open

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That's not at all how that works. Of course you can be called and answer phone calls while any app is open without any permissions, it just changes to the caller app. Have you literally never taken a phone call while on your phone before?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago

no need to be a cunt about it just tell me im wrong