this post was submitted on 28 Jan 2025
114 points (98.3% liked)

Technology

1709 readers
620 users here now

Which posts fit here?

Anything that is at least tangentially connected to the technology, social media platforms, informational technologies and tech policy.


Rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original linkPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

[email protected]
[email protected]


Icon attribution | Banner attribution

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The tech exists, and vehicles on the road already have it, yet a consortium of carmakers doesn’t want to make this lifesaving equipment standard. The reason is as old as the hills—money.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The problem is that these systems are not a replacement for a human. Humans need to be in full control at all times. The problem is that the car companies and law makers apparently think some computer system is more capable than a person.

There so is the issue of longevity and privacy. At the end of the day I will drive old cars since they are usually easier to work on and build to last.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

That and I'm just generally against the government telling me what I have to do. I will wear a seatbelt because it is an obvious safety benefit but I don't think it should be mandatory. If someone wants to skip wearing a safety device then that should be their choice. Plus we need to thin the herd a bit. I say let the idiots who won't wear helmets on bikes die off.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I think it should absolutely be mandatory since it saves so many lives.

People fail to measure risks effectively. Everyone is scared of sharks and clowns but they are fine driving.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

People really do fail to measure risks effectively. But if people aren't going to think critically and use safety measures that are around do we really need them in our society? We have been protecting way too many idiots from glorious Darwin awards.

The types of people who don't wear helmets or seatbelts probably shouldn't be reproducing so if we let them do what they want and they die that removes the stupid genes from the pool. I see nothing but benefits.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

That way of thinking is called Eugenics dates back a long ways. It was very popular with certain government in the 30's and early 40's.

There is no scientific evidence to support it though. People are on average getting smarter and murdering part of the population via birth control or other means does not have an impact. In fact, it hurts diversity which harms society in the long term. Don't fall for the easy trains of thought that create Nazis.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 days ago

I wasnt actually calling for eugenics to be clear. I just don't really care to go out of my way to protect stupid people from themselves. I'm all for warning them and telling them what they are doing is stupid but if they insist on it I'm not gonna stop em.

Like the guys that ride motorcycles without helmets in the states that still allow it. It is obviously an incredibly stupid idea but I say let em.