politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
view the rest of the comments
10 USC 15 does, indeed, allow for the military to provide assistance to law enforcement agencies under specific circumstances. Among other requirements, they have to have an LEO on board the aircraft. The LEO ostensibly supervises the operation: the military members present are operating under the authority of the officer.
Here's the problem: They are trying to argue against birthright citizenship on the basis that undocumented immigrants are not "subject to the jurisdiction" of the united states (14th Amendment). Diplomats and enemy combatants are not subject to the laws of the united states. They cannot be charged or convicted under US criminal code. They can only be held in accordance with the Laws of Armed Conflict, and treated as POWs rather than accused criminals. The military can detain people as POWs, but it cannot enforce the law domestically.
As soon as they claim 10 USC 15 justification, or they put an LEO in charge of the operation, the government loses its "subject to the jurisdiction" argument.
The government can't claim justification under 10 USC 15. They need to argue that the immigrants are a category of people that the military can lawfully detain. They need to argue that the immigrants in question are invaders; enemy combatants.