this post was submitted on 03 Feb 2025
350 points (98.6% liked)

politics

19675 readers
4239 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Trump’s new tariffs on Canada, Mexico, and China sparked backlash from business groups, economists, and some Republicans, who warn of rising prices and economic disruption.

The tariffs—25% on Canadian and Mexican imports and 10% on Chinese goods—prompted retaliatory measures from Canada and Mexico.

Critics, including the US Chamber of Commerce, call them a tax on American consumers. Economists estimate a $200 billion hit to the US economy, with inflation rising.

Trump defended the move, even suggesting Canada should become the US’s “51st state.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 day ago (2 children)

The fuck did they think was going to happen?

[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Collapse the country so he and his buddies can make a killing, no doubt.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago (2 children)

They would make more money by operating as normal. Collapsing the stock market is going to make it worse for them.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Not on the long run, and not by the rules they're playing by now.

Top 10 richest men in America doubled their total wealth during the COVID downturn. From 750bn to 1.5tn. DOUBLED IN TWO YEARS.

Market collapses allow those with the most current assets buy up everyone else's assets at fire sale prices, and raid the government coffers for "bail out" money. They want that scenario to repeat, only now with a much, much deeper, country-wide drop than the temporary Covid bump.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

How does doubling wealth matter if the systems that give their wealth any value crumble?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

"Wealth" as described in terms of US dollars is just an imaginary accounting measure. And it hasn't really "meant" anything since the death of Bretton-Woods and the removal of the gold standard.

That wealth the richest hold is assets. Physical things. Control of physical things. Control of entire populations and their ability to survive.

The fed could change the accounting to Bitcoin tomorrow and would not change the fact that those top 10 richest men control a vast majority of our nation. But that's not enough, no, they want to control all of it.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago

It only works if America recovers in his lifetime, of course.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago

These are the guys who thought tariffs and alienating a good chunk of the population were a great idea. They're not in it for the long run, only the 4-year cash grab.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This is the result of a mind that has been fed the myth of "American Exceptionalism" since day one and has never had to suffer the consequences of his actions.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago

Eh, didn't he piss off American banks so bad he went to Russia for continued financing for his ~~business deals~~ uninterrupted largesse?

Besides, his father was first generation citizen, his mother was an immigrant. So, no, that's got nothing to do with his motivation here. It fits, however, with getting his ~~loyal supporters~~ dupes to keep supporting him.