this post was submitted on 03 Feb 2025
285 points (96.7% liked)

Anti-Corporate Movement

529 readers
145 users here now

This community is the first one on lemmy of its kind. It sits between the idea of anarchism/anti-capitalism and left leaning economic policy.

Our goal is to make people aware of the dangers of corporate control, its influence on governments and people as well as the small but steady abrasion of empathy around the world indirectly caused by it.

Current topics this includes but is not limited to:

Feel free to debate this but beware, corporate rhetoric is not welcome here. If you have arguments, bring them on. If its rhetoric trying to defend the evil actions of corporations, we will know and you will go.

Our declared goal so far is to have all companies and individuals worldwide capped at 999 mil USD in all assets, including ownership of other companies, sister companies and marital assets. The reason for this is that companies (and individuals) are not supposed to resemble small(?) countries with a single leader(-board) and shareholder primacy. Thats why we feel like they must be kept in check indefinitely.

But companies will just wander off The argument that large companies will just wander off is valid, which we embrace. We dont need microsoft, apple, google, amazon and other trillion dollar companies. There are small competitors being kept small and driven into brankruptcy by anti competitive behavior of these giants or simply bought up and closed. If starbucks left tomorrow, we would not have an issue with this.

But then we have x little microsofts that all belong to the same person(s) If in fact nobody was allowed to accumulate more than 999 mil in assets, they would not be able to own all these. And like defending agains burglary, it is not about complete defence but time and effort. You only have to keep the thief occupied long enough for them to be caught, give up or make a mistake.

But these giants have tons of IP which would then limit our growth Thats another topic we must touch on. We will (only this one time) take a page out of russias playbook and demand that IP of non complying companies (assets over 999 mil USD) will be declared invalid, which opens them up to be copied.

But then they will "live" in one country that doesnt accept this Correct, and they should be taken into custody the moment they enter the airspace of a country that supports this act.

founded 10 months ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] [email protected] 34 points 1 day ago (1 children)

In a cross-posted thread, I've seen plenty people mentioning that others don't even go voting. I think this is a bit defeatist; at least here in Brazil, most non-voters say stuff like "voting is pointless, it doesn't change anything". This means that they could potentially join a strike, if they were certain that it would improve things for them.

It's probably the same in other countries.

A few points on increasing odds of success:

  • Never say how long the strike should last. The uncertainty makes it feel worse for your opponents; doubly so for corporations (as they hate unnecessary risks, and the strike going on for a long time is a risk for them).
  • Have a concise list of clear demands. At least some of them should be obviously advantageous to the strikers, even the non-politicised ones.
  • Some politicisation of the strikers is good. Just keep in mind that most don't want to hear about theoretical stuff. (Do explain the theoretical stuff to the willing ones though.)
  • If you want 100, ask for 200. Let the other side negotiate it down back to 100. (They'd still do it if you asked for 100 - except that they'd negotiate it to 50.)
  • Watch out for false flags stirring trouble. They'll do shit like throw stones at residential windows (to get non-strikers pissed at you, and justify the cops [ACAB] pepper spraying you.) And in general keep good discipline among strikers, always reminding them why, how, who, and against whom you all are striking.
  • Also watch out for groups trying to co-opt the strike into "their" strike. They should feel welcome to join, but they should not seize control over the whole.
  • Uni students are specially eager to join. Don't ignore them.

Source: mostly personal experience. I'm nowadays disengaged, but a decade or so ago I was in a socialist party, and joined quite a few strikes.

[โ€“] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago

This is probably the greatest thing i have read in a long time. Thank you so much for posting it.