Anti-Corporate Movement
This community is the first one on lemmy of its kind. It sits between the idea of anarchism/anti-capitalism and left leaning economic policy.
Our goal is to make people aware of the dangers of corporate control, its influence on governments and people as well as the small but steady abrasion of empathy around the world indirectly caused by it.
Current topics this includes but is not limited to:
- Meta's entry into the fediverse
- Game companies putting gambling mechanics in childrens games
- Embracer groups buyout and closing of smaller game studios
- IP trolls destroying small companies and keeping progress back for profit
Feel free to debate this but beware, corporate rhetoric is not welcome here. If you have arguments, bring them on. If its rhetoric trying to defend the evil actions of corporations, we will know and you will go.
Our declared goal so far is to have all companies and individuals worldwide capped at 999 mil USD in all assets, including ownership of other companies, sister companies and marital assets. The reason for this is that companies (and individuals) are not supposed to resemble small(?) countries with a single leader(-board) and shareholder primacy. Thats why we feel like they must be kept in check indefinitely.
But companies will just wander off The argument that large companies will just wander off is valid, which we embrace. We dont need microsoft, apple, google, amazon and other trillion dollar companies. There are small competitors being kept small and driven into brankruptcy by anti competitive behavior of these giants or simply bought up and closed. If starbucks left tomorrow, we would not have an issue with this.
But then we have x little microsofts that all belong to the same person(s) If in fact nobody was allowed to accumulate more than 999 mil in assets, they would not be able to own all these. And like defending agains burglary, it is not about complete defence but time and effort. You only have to keep the thief occupied long enough for them to be caught, give up or make a mistake.
But these giants have tons of IP which would then limit our growth Thats another topic we must touch on. We will (only this one time) take a page out of russias playbook and demand that IP of non complying companies (assets over 999 mil USD) will be declared invalid, which opens them up to be copied.
But then they will "live" in one country that doesnt accept this Correct, and they should be taken into custody the moment they enter the airspace of a country that supports this act.
view the rest of the comments
This posts claims that out power does not lie in the voting both. That it's a this or there matter. Which is bs, we have power unionizing, and we have power in the voting booth.
If you don't intend to discount votes, then don't post that
I can see your point. Right now, the danger isnt avoided by voting though. It has been tried and it failed in the US and most of europe. Democracy has become toothless. Most boundaries have been crossed. Constant brainwashing has won against common sense. Now it is time to demonstrate who is in charge.
I think disinformation is a major part of the problem too. There's even bots posting on here now.
We can't fight the problem we don't know about. Powerful people around the world may like to call it sensorship, but fighting disinformation is important.
We've seen this a while back too. When people stormed the capital believing a coup was the democratic thing to do. Before you can gain power by unionizing you need to get people to agree on the necessary actions.
And right now, I think some countries are just too devided for rhat
Thats mostly what I think as well, apart from the too divided.
https://generalstrikeus.com/ was the address iirc.
The „divided“ part is how it has always been. That was what voting was for. But brainwashed people will always agree with the brainwasher no matter their self interest. It is their goal to make us think we are divided - worldwide mind you.
But we are not and if a couple million people take to the streets and stop working, we will bring the system of oppression down.
There have always been disagreements, yes. But it's not black and white. There's topics people agree on, and not. And how intensely so.
That's why we have more than two options to vote, and why new parties pop up every now and then. And people need to be informed of their options, so they can vote in their best interests
Exactly. Especially withoutconstant lies inbetween
Maybe best not to misrepresent that, even if it's just one out of your many questionable posts
No idea what you‘re talking about, honestly.
You haven't seen your own posts? That's a first
Yeah, we both know where this ends. Have fun somewhere else, troll. This sub is not for you.