Technology

63547 readers

3158 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each other!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

384

Time to get serious with E2E encrypted messaging (techcrunch.com)

submitted 3 weeks ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

126 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I currently use Telegram for my friends and family, but have reluctantly come to the conclusion that the UK Government is either reaching agreement for backdoors with messaging services, or is trying its hardest to.

I'm also on Element/Matrix. Before I try to get my contacts to join me on there, should I be aware of any privacy issues or is that a good place to head?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I have no idea about this, but as of now anyone can register.

For reference, CSAM is Belgium's government portal and a system of login, as far as I know, so I assume it would be used to check if someone is a minor at the time of registration

Child safety is important but implementing this would kind of defeat the purpose of a privacy focused app.

I agree that just gatekeeping children and therefore verifying everyone with a government platform, but then it raises the question on how to improve child safety on an app that's self-hostable with not even user IDs to identify the users?

I don't have an answer to that, but I don't like just saying "This solution is bad", I always try to add "So try this instead, because XXX"

[–] endofline 1 points 3 weeks ago

Yes, the child safety is very necessary. The simplest solution for simplex would be simply the "parental control" like restricting the contacts or allowed groups by checking by the phone number or imei with no client side scanning... However, EU is to force such client side scanning.

As simplex is open source, clones could show up with no restrictions but this can be prevented with the blocks on the google play (parental control) and so on. Of course, you can never solve the issue with completely new phone with the sim card bought on some "homeless" person but there is no bulletproof solutions.

It's worrying trend that EU now chooses the worst solutions for quite long time