this post was submitted on 10 Feb 2025
355 points (98.6% liked)

PC Gaming

9378 readers
1057 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 11 points 4 days ago (7 children)

Who the hell would force ads on a pc game.

[–] [email protected] 35 points 4 days ago
[–] [email protected] 28 points 4 days ago

EA. Microsoft. Sony. They all already have product placement similar to movies in their games. Anything to make a buck, except make good games.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Along a laundry list of bad companies there's runescape fucking RUNESCAPE of all games!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I sounds like a joke, but they've had the cycle of
1: release controversial change to get more money
2: get protests/boycotts of people stopping their membership (subscription)
3: make an 'agreement' that still gets them more money but is mild enough that protests won't meaningfully continue
4: wait a few months for people to cool off
5: repeat

I think this 'cycle' was a lot more violent this time because it was made by a parent company rather than Jagex themselves.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago

Never knew a cycle existed

[–] [email protected] 11 points 4 days ago

This seems to be targeting "watch these ads to get credits" model, which is pretty common in free-to-play games.

One of the funnier/less annoying ads-in-game I've seen would be where they fill the spaces where ads normally are, though. Like, if a game had an IRL stadium or street, they would replace the billboard contents with their own ad content instead of putting in ersatz advertising.

[–] stardust 7 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Whatever happens on mobile has ended up being adopted onto traditional gaming platforms down the line. My first encounter with stuff like IAPs was on mobile and lot of people's first introduction to gaming these days is mobile games, so next generation will be more open to it.

[–] teejugg 2 points 3 days ago

A lot of people 😆

[–] ILikeBoobies 4 points 4 days ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

They have game-interrupting full screen ads? Our just product placement. Because only the former is banned

[–] ILikeBoobies 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I guess not interrupting because players don’t view having to click through ads to get to the menu as interrupting

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Which game makes you click through ads to get to the menu?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 days ago

Does it count if they are ads for things in the game I am playing? Cuz that seems to be pretty standard in a lot of MP shooters these days where every time you log in, you're bombarded with what are basically ads for new skins, events, features, etc.

[–] ILikeBoobies 2 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

What the other person said is what I’m referring to

though the nhl games put actual ads on the boards and pause menu that change on updates cycles

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago

So like Fifa,Makes sense tbh.