this post was submitted on 11 Feb 2025
56 points (91.2% liked)
Science
3595 readers
263 users here now
General discussions about "science" itself
Be sure to also check out these other Fediverse science communities:
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Of course it doesn't. It's just... Real men where never meant to reach an age where cognitive decline would ever be an issue.
Age 45/50 max, fermenting in the stomach of a sabertooth tiger or dying to a preventable sickness by 'walking it off'
Most science puts the age of elders in nomadic prehistoric groups between 60 and 70. Infant mortality was a problem, but once the child was over puberty, they tended to live longer than their early farmer counterparts.
Oke? Age 45/50 is still the peak age to get eaten by a gigantic hungry animal.
Why is 45/50 the peak age to be eaten by an animal, a 50 year old, though old can still be a strong fighter. A baby or an old man, or pregnant female is a much easier target.
But that's not really an issue, humans were "meant" to live to their 70s. Data suggests that before we settled down to one place, that's when we died, the average is brought down by infant morality
I can never tell in situations like this if I'm actively being trolled, or if people just don't get my stupid jokes.