Microblog Memes

7049 readers

2754 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
Be nice.
No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

720

Donald Trump's "Peace Deal" is meant to give Russia everything they want (ponder.cat)

submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

106 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] -4 points 1 month ago (4 children)

I don’t think I’ve ever said anything quite this outrageous but… uh… fair enough?

What do you find so outrageous.

If you want to add something of value to this discussion inform me on what Harris would have actually done to help Ukraine or give them anything substantively different than what Trump is offering. Instead of just saying you find what I'm saying outrageous.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I wasn't trying to add something of value to the discussion; Bucket did that already. I was just remarking on an interesting... phenomenon??? in the wild; don't mind me. However, to actually respond to your point: Trump is going behind Ukraine's back to draft a peace deal that will result in them losing territory if they accept it. Harris was not going to do that. Rather than Harris being a positive Trump is being a negative here.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 month ago (2 children)

However, to actually respond to your point: Trump is going behind Ukraine’s back to draft a peace deal that will result in them losing territory if they accept it. Harris was not going to do that. Rather than Harris being a positive Trump is being a negative here.

Harris was most likely going to continue what Biden was doing. If you think what Biden was doing was a positive I can't understand why? I don't think giving just enough help to keep things at a standstill is particularly positive. If she offered to do much more than Biden was doing I could follow your logic.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

Keeping things at a standstill is nowhere near good, but it is still infinitely better than rewarding the aggressor by just handing them everything they would have ever wanted, especially when they are in no position to actually take it themselves in the foreseeable future if things continue like they have been.

load more comments (1 replies)