this post was submitted on 13 Feb 2025
45 points (97.9% liked)

Asklemmy

44978 readers
1286 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
45
Do you have any rules you try to follow when engaging with others online? (sopuli.xyz)
submitted 1 day ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
46 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

I'm curious what, if any, guidelines people self-impose to try and engage in a productive way online (both on Lemmy and elsewhere). "Netiquette" if you will.

A couple of rules that I think are good practices, but still see too often, are:

  • don't pile onto the most downvoted comment. Kinda like don't feed the trolls, but it's more about not letting yourself get rage baited. Instead, downvote them and move on.
  • don't give a non-answer to someone's question. Ex. if someone asks how to do X, don't answer with, "Why are you trying to do X? You shouldn't want to do X. Do Y instead." Instead, explain what it would take to do X, and then offer Y as a possible alternative and why it may be a better option. But assume they already know about Y, and it doesn't fit their use-case.

For that last one, finding a thread where someone has asked the exact question you want answered, only to find a thread full of upvoted non-answers is up there with the dreaded "nvm, I figured it out - 10y ago".

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] [email protected] 11 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

Downvotes are not for disagreements.

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 20 hours ago (3 children)

What are they for? Like/dislike?

[โ€“] [email protected] 3 points 3 hours ago

Downvotes are for low-quality content, bad-faith content, etc.

Most bright-line example of this is: if OP asks "what's your favourite fruit" and somebody says "bananas," don't downvote it just because you dislike bananas.

It gets harder when somebody says something you disagree with politically, but argues it well and in good faith. I would still not downvote in this circumstance.

For an example of when I would downvote: if OP asks "do bananas contain potassium?" and commenter says "No, only potatoes contain potassium." -- this is low quality content, they could have confirmed their answer with a quick google search.

[โ€“] [email protected] 2 points 14 hours ago

I saw somebody suggest that the voting buttons should be used to indicate whether the comment benefits the discussion or not.

I suppose the same would be true of the original post; does the post benefit the community.

For example, posting a blog of why Mitsubishi is the best car maker to a photography forum is a downvote, true or not. Posting that veganism isn't a sustainable lifestyle to a vegan sub is an upvote, but you'd better be ready for some backlash.

[โ€“] [email protected] 4 points 20 hours ago

I only downvote when something is blatantly factually false or posted in bad faith (i.e. obviously trolling and I can't think of a good-faith reason why someone would post this).

If I merely disagree with something, I write an answer explaining why, or if there already is one that I agree with, I upvote that.

[โ€“] [email protected] -1 points 19 hours ago

I disagree