jsomae

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (1 children)

oh interesting. This was hard for me to see. I wonder about the car that's stopped in the road, though. Did he really go measure it?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

so that would make this... america second party?

[–] [email protected] 20 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

I hope this becomes big enough to split the right-wing vote. I wish him all the success possible.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 hours ago (3 children)

How was this measured?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

The rationale being that we would have more trees if we didn't have so many roads?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 hours ago

my expectation is that this troll is not merely conservative, but actually intentionally malicious.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 hours ago

My understanding of the word "shitpost" is that it means good-natured trolling.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 hours ago

Lol yeah both sides would be. I say this as a proud leftist haha.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

This or something similar has happened to everyone I know 🇨🇦

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

It's not my fault if somebody makes content at a loss and isn't able to recuperate their losses. It happens all the time, sucks for them. I mean that earnestly by the way, though it sounds callous -- it really does suck for them, and I feel bad for artists who can't turn a profit.

However, I just don't agree with you that "objective harm" is done when one pirates media. If this were true, you must admit that it's equally objectively harmful to the IP holder for one to not consume media at all. I just don't see how you can square that.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 hours ago

I think we're all familiar with weaponized legal language. Unauthorized reproduction sounds scarier to most of us than piracy.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Real pirates steal stuff. So-called digital "piracy" isn't piracy at all. This is just propaganda for the business model that the establishment is trying to hold onto.

It doesn't hurt IP holders to "pirate" their data. It is no difference to them whether you were to pirate it or to have never been born at all in the first place. Their profit is the exact same either way. Their business model is imaginary and they want to force it on everyone else.

 

Seems like over the last week everyone in this community is talking about how the real reason AI is bad is because it is destroying the planet. Does this even matter though? AI is bad for so many other reasons. It's destroying art. It's destroying Hollywood. It's removing jobs from the workforce, and it's concentrating power and money. And ontop of all that, it produces only soulless slop.

We have a good front line there. We can rally around those points.

When you try to bring questionable objections like power an water usage onto the table, it just makes our front-line look weaker, since opponents can easily pick these arguments apart. "Sure it's a lot of power, but this will lead to nuclear power, which is a net win environmentally." Or, "a single AI query consumes 2 litres of water?? You mean milliliters, and it's just going to rain from the sky, and nobody is putting big datacentres in California anyway, and that's only 1/6th of the amount of water it takes to grow an almond." Or "yeah, google alone uses as much power as the entire city of Toronto, but Toronto uses green power; so what?"

And yes, we all have counter-arguments to these -- "how to deal with nuclear waste?" and "only a fraction of rain water is collected as potable water" and "almonds may take more water than AI but almonds are still bad" and "there are some datacentres in California" and so on but the deeper these arguments go the harder it is to maintain a stable front.

Can we all just admit that this environmental angle is a red herring? I could almost believe it's a psy-op intended to discredit the anti-AI crowd. Even if the environmental impact of AI is bad, I still think it's worse for our cause to focus on the environmental aspect than the other aspects. The world has already decided it doesn't care about the environment.

 

Curious if any women have tried taking T. I'm much younger than her but I've been feeling some of the symptoms she's talked about a lot, and I'm wondering if T might help. But obviously I'm worried about the effects of it.

Not looking for medical advice, just curious about other people's experiences.

 

I'm really loving Pedro Pascal these days.

-11
submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

This is an inclusive community for all things women. Whether you’re here for make up tips, feminism or just friendly chit chat, we’ve got you covered.

I feel like men can do all of those things, so I don't see why we are excluding them. Just because it's a women-centric community doesn't mean they shouldn't be allowed. I think we should exclude people who are bigoted instead, or even people who just don't "get" women's issues.

Aside: I'm personally irritated that make-up is what's considered a woman-centric topic. That's kind of reductive -- not everyone is femme.

 

I changed the title from "Spying" to "Eavesdropping" because the article actually directly supports that it is "spying" on you, just not listening.

 

Hi, I'm a canadian woman. This community, well, caught my eye, when I was browsing the list of communities on lemmy.ca. Anyway, given how toxic lemmy is as a whole, I'm really impressed that this is a very nice space you've made here. You guys need to spread the detox around more.

Lemme know how I can be an ally I guess

view more: next ›