this post was submitted on 20 Feb 2025
51 points (84.9% liked)

Lemmy.world Support

3310 readers
34 users here now

Lemmy.world Support

Welcome to the official Lemmy.world Support community! Post your issues or questions about Lemmy.world here.

This community is for issues related to the Lemmy World instance only. For Lemmy software requests or bug reports, please go to the Lemmy github page.

This community is subject to the rules defined here for lemmy.world.

To open a support ticket Static Badge


You can also DM https://lemmy.world/u/lwreport or email [email protected] (PGP Supported) if you need to reach our directly to the admin team.


Follow us for server news 🐘

Outages 🔥

https://status.lemmy.world/



founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

c/conservative has been left modless. I'd like to request to moderate and clean up any misinformation on this community.

I am consistently online here and prepared to take on the responsibility.

Thank you for your consideration!

The requested community link is [email protected]

Additionally, I'd also like to request [email protected] as for that one it seems a spam account created it and has since been abandoned for months

ETA:

Given the controversial nature of the comms topic, I have decided to add a proposed set of rules that I was thinking about, to keep it strictly parody without going off the rails:

  1. Parody With Purpose: This is a space for humorous takes on conservative politics. We welcome satire, but draw the line at content that promotes racism, sexism, homophobia, or other forms of bigotry.
  1. Memes Over Manifestos: This community focuses on humor and parody, not serious political debate. There are plenty of spaces for earnest conservative discussion—this isn't one of them.
  1. Highlight Contradictions: The best content points out inconsistencies and hypocrisies in conservative talking points. Creative commentary is encouraged.
  1. Public Figures Fair Game: Politicians and pundits can be satirized, but no targeting of private individuals, doxxing, or harassment.
  1. No News Zone: Memes only, news should be sent to the nearest relevant comm
  1. Clear Satire: Make your satirical intent reasonably clear. We're here to mock bad ideas, not accidentally spread them.
  1. Relevant Content: All posts should relate to conservative politics or ideologies in some way.
  1. Community Respect: Disagree with fellow members all you want, but personal attacks aren't welcome. Save the criticism for the ideas, not each other.
  1. Moderation Discretion: Mods will use reasonable judgment in applying these rules. We'll be fair, but firm.
  1. Remember The Purpose: This community exists as a pressure valve—a place to process through humor the often frustrating world of conservative politics.
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (3 children)

.world c/conservative is unmodded now too! Post all the things they hate!

OPs post history makes it very clear he doesn't actually want to mod that community in good faith.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

I spoke about this in another thread, but it seems like a very delicate balancing act to find the right moderator for that kind of community. To be a conservative is to be tolerant of fascists and Neo-Nazis to some degree. In the current political climate, it is inevitable that any right-leaning community will have elements of these abhorrent ideologies. I don't think fascists and Neo-Nazis should be tolerated to exist in any space. No community as a whole is made safer by their presence, quite the opposite. So any moderator of a conservative community either must not be a conservative themselves or be one of the seemingly minority of conservatives that utterly disavow nationalists and bigotry, but this would put them in a position of poorly representing the community they moderate.

It's a tricky situation. And I'm not sure if there's a solution that both makes sense and permits a conservative community to exist.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

To be a conservative is to be tolerant of fascists and Neo-Nazis to some degree

That is unfortunatly the truth for a lot of conservative parties around the world these days, but I don't agree that one personally has to do that to be a conservative. So I really disagree with that sentiment.

However I do agree that it is a very tricky situation indeed.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I'm not so sure. I think there are conservatives who truly believe themselves to be intolerant of fascists and bigots but, first and foremost, they are not representative of conservatives as a whole and therefore may not be best suited to represent and moderate a community of conservatives, and secondly, I'm reminded of the German saying about Nazis at the table. If there is a table of ten people and a Nazi sits down with them and no one leaves, there are 11 Nazis at the table.

I'll admit that this is a fairly American-centric view of conservatives and while it may be as you say, similar in other parts of the world, I honestly don't know enough to agree with any certainty.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago

Obviously not. There is no such thing as a conservative that acts in good faith in the first place.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I have not posted any misinformation, I have pledged to clear up known misinformation spreader links such as Breitbart

[–] [email protected] -3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I didn't say you did. But you spend the entire morning spamming the community with memes intended to troll the members, exploiting the fact that it was unmodded and breaking rule 6. That's not behaviour becoming of a mod anywhere and certainly not in a community which you ideologically oppose.

But hey, not my decision, just providing some background info.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 week ago

I see your point, however, in my view it has been abandoned with the only serious posters posting mostly misinformation and is open to be remade in "a new image". In fact, it seems the only time "good" source links were posted (i.e. AP news) was after it went modless (for the most part)