this post was submitted on 20 Feb 2025
582 points (97.7% liked)

World News

41187 readers
4735 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

A European Parliament member claimed that the U.S. gave Europe three weeks to agree on Ukraine's "surrender" terms or risk an American withdrawal from Europe.

Mika Aaltola made the claim on X, but provided no evidence. NBC News reported that Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth suggested a U.S. troop reduction in Europe.

Trump reportedly plans to cut 20,000 troops and demand greater NATO contributions. He has pushed for higher NATO defense spending.

Trump may meet with Putin soon, believing Russia holds the upper hand in negotiations.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

More like

"If you don't vote in an election, you don't prefer one candidate over the other / oppose one candidate!"

Now tell me Harris would've been equally bad...

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Harris would've been better than trump, but that's not the boon you may think it is.

The problem with biden and harris is they convince the left that a slow loss is winning. It's not. The disparity in wealth continued to grow under biden, just not as fast as it would have under trump.

Until the left can grow some cajones and rescind its rampant consumerism, either politician that wins is a loss for the working class.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

And yet it would've been far better to choose the slow loss over the immediate loss

[–] [email protected] -4 points 1 day ago

It's fine if you think that.