this post was submitted on 23 Feb 2025
260 points (96.4% liked)

Marvel Studios

3199 readers
50 users here now

Lemmy

Welcome to MarvelStudios, a community for discussing all things related to Marvel TV/Film productions with a focus on Marvel Studios.

This community is a place to discuss, share and generally have fun with all things Marvel Studios.

Upcoming TV/Film:

MCU TV/Film Discussion:

Non-MCU Discussion:

Misc Discussion:

Community Guidelines

  1. Be constructive. As a community this is place for discussion, things you liked, things you didn't like, any everything in between. Low effort comments don't add to the discussion.
  2. Be civil. Disagreements happen. Don't attack others. Take a moment and reconsider before you post an inflammatory comment in all caps.
  3. No spam. Please don't post spam, trolling or other low effort content. If you're a human and you saw something interesting or had an interesting thought, you're probably fine.
  4. Memes are allowed. We're a small community, feel free to post memes or similar content. Funny things are good. If it becomes a problem we can discuss changing the rules.

In addition like any community we follow the Lemmy.World content policy rules. In short, don't attack people or groups.

Spoiler Guidelines

When should something no longer be considered a spoiler? In general use your best judgement. If want something more specific,

Related Communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
260
Hideo Kojima gives his thoughts on "Captain America: Brave New World" (i.postimg.cc)
submitted 5 days ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
107 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 days ago (2 children)

You know the funniest thing about people arguing about this with you? If you had watched Falcon and the Winter Soldier, which I guess these people didn't, you'd know that it starts out with him not being Captain America. He literally gives the shield up and because he doesn't want to be Captain America. So the argument that he became Captain America because of the scene at the end of end game is literally not true. He wasn't Captain America because of that scene he was Captain America because of the choices he makes at the end of the show.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 5 days ago (1 children)

If you didn't watch the show, you don't know Sam gave up the shield. You see him get the shield in Endgame, Steve tells him it suits him, then in the next movie, everybody calls him Cap. What do you need here? A connect-the-dot game? A coloring book?

[–] [email protected] -2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

So I'm confused your argument here is that if you don't know what happened then you don't know you're wrong? What a silly line of reasoning. Imagine tying yourself into this kind of knot to defend the writing of a Marvel film. Lol.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I don't think you know what your argument is. Someone who didn't watch the show wouldn't notice that something happened, the connection fits. You are using your knowledge of the show to point out that this connection is not the straight line it seems to be, but that's not relevant, it doesn't matter to the 2 movies. It'll matter in Thunderbolts with John's own story, but not here. The show is extra information with its own story, which is nice, but it's not critical.

Imagine working so hard to find a plot hole in something you hate. You're overthinking things.

[–] [email protected] -5 points 5 days ago

My only argument was that it was silly you people were getting all bent out of shape about something when your point was literally the opposite of the reality. The scene in end game is not Sam becoming Captain America. You're making bad faith arguments. Which is funny. That's the only argument I ever made. Your comments have just compounded the silliness of the situation.

Also never even suggested I hated the shows. So don't know where you pulled that straw man out of.

[–] [email protected] -5 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Yep. Its just astroturfers being overly sensitive and defensive, since the movie has opened recently.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Is this comment not under the license?

[–] [email protected] -4 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Um, are you literally following me around, checking my comments?

I'm sorry to have disappointed you by not adding a licensing link to my comment that you replied to. Didn't realize you needed that in your life.

Don't worry though, I got you covered. Sleep well, little one, sleep well. ...

~This~ ~comment~ ~is~ ~licensed~ ~under~ ~CC~ ~BY-NC-SA~ ~4.0~

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

To be fair, you're commenting all over this thread. I was genuinely interested in why one message wouldn't have your little copy paste, if there was any significance in that. I do think the whole thing is silly, but it was genuine curiosity.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

To be fair, you’re commenting all over this thread.

Well I only license label my content when it's actually content from me, and not me simply replying to a question with an answer. At least that's my general rule that I try to use.

But honestly, I tend to think you're more backtracking than being honest about your reasons why you made your initial comment to me, considering you made it at the same time I'm having a heated discussion with others about my use of a license on another post. If I'm wrong in that, you have my apologies.

But it did seem a little creepy for you to make that comment, considering it has nothing to do with the subject being discussed. I mean, you could always just let it go, and not comment on it in the first place. /shrug

~This~ ~comment~ ~is~ ~licensed~ ~under~ ~CC~ ~BY-NC-SA~ ~4.0~

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Well, what in this comment do you consider content? I don't understand why the comment you've made here is more "content" than answering a question.

Check my history and you'll see I'm also engaging with, and actually being WAYYYYY meaner to, the guy that was being a dick to you. Kinda embarrassed him tbh.

I don't see why you would think it's creepy. It's not like I'm personally interested in you or your life. I just wondered why you seemed to be inconsistent about it.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 4 days ago

Well, what in this comment do you consider content?

I consider most of what I type as content that I create. But if its a very simple phrase, like "thank you", something like that, I won't bother with the link, because I also declare everything that I post/command is covered by the same license in my user account information.

And I do appreciate the defence, truly. I just wish I didn't have to talk/type so much about the license/link, vs being able to talk about the subjects that I am commenting in/on instead. Its why I keep referring people to my comment history, if they are being intellectually honest and have an honest curiosity as to why I do it, so that I can talk about the subject at hand instead of CC licenses usage.

~This~ ~comment~ ~is~ ~licensed~ ~under~ ~CC~ ~BY-NC-SA~ ~4.0~