this post was submitted on 24 Feb 2025
395 points (99.3% liked)
HistoryPorn
5456 readers
309 users here now
If you would like to become a mod in this community, kindly PM the mod.
Relive the Past in Jaw-Dropping Detail!
HistoryPorn is for photographs (or, if it can be found, film) of the past, recent or distant! Give us a little snapshot of history!
Rules
- Be respectful and inclusive.
- No harassment, hate speech, or trolling.
- Engage in constructive discussions.
- Share relevant content.
- Follow guidelines and moderators' instructions.
- Use appropriate language and tone.
- Report violations.
- Foster a continuous learning environment.
- No genocide or atrocity denialism.
Pictures of old artifacts and museum pieces should go to History Artifacts
Illustrations and paintings should go to History Drawings
Related Communities:
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Commenting, as always, to say that's not how the 2A was meant to be used. That's a modern interpretation. Read it for yourself. It's clearly talking about having militias ready to fight an invading country, as was standard practice at the time. Standing professional armies were unusual, especially for newly formed small nations.
Well I just think that whole part about “being necessary to the security of a free State” could be speaking about foreign or domestic threats.
And god fucking damn it I can’t find a SINGLE useful webpage on the original text of the 2nd amendment. Fuckin’ pissing me off lmao I swear this happens any time I try to find something about the constitution, it’s a god damned mess lol
Really? This is the site for amendments (for now at least). It's the second result when I search. Second to Wikipedia.
I can see the argument for what you said, but it pretty clearly isn't the primary reason, looking back with a historical lense. It also specifically says "well regulated militia" which definitely does not refer to people with no training who never use their weapon having one in their house. Usually a militia would store their weapons in a central place and would also train to be ready when called. The individual storage and ownership thing is not the expectation historically.
I see, thanks for explaining. And for the link.
But since we’re talking about Black Panthers, don’t they meet the criteria for being a militia? That’s what I was referring to in my original comment.
It depends on the definition, but not really. Pretty much every definition is an army of citizens the state can call into service when needed. It isn't just an organized group of armed people.