And that's why guns are banned from federal buildings; ole Ronny didn't like black people with guns
this post was submitted on 24 Feb 2025
394 points (99.2% liked)
HistoryPorn
5456 readers
80 users here now
If you would like to become a mod in this community, kindly PM the mod.
Relive the Past in Jaw-Dropping Detail!
HistoryPorn is for photographs (or, if it can be found, film) of the past, recent or distant! Give us a little snapshot of history!
Rules
- Be respectful and inclusive.
- No harassment, hate speech, or trolling.
- Engage in constructive discussions.
- Share relevant content.
- Follow guidelines and moderators' instructions.
- Use appropriate language and tone.
- Report violations.
- Foster a continuous learning environment.
- No genocide or atrocity denialism.
Pictures of old artifacts and museum pieces should go to History Artifacts
Illustrations and paintings should go to History Drawings
Related Communities:
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Ronald Wilson Reagan. 666
I'm glad Reagan dead
Pretty much every gun law we have is/was rooted in racism. The picture above is what started California's crazy gun laws. Armed blacks!? In my streets?!
Here's a gun law you'll love! In Alabama you have to apply to the county sheriff for a conceal-carry license. Told my friend, "Good thing you're a middle-aged white guy. That'll be a rubber stamp." Meanwhile, in Florida, now that we no longer need a license to carry, the state sent mine 4 years after applying. Uh, thanks, I guess?
Yeah, the Black Panthers inadvertently spurred Reagan and the NRA to author the Mulford Act, which was (at the time) the most restrictive gun control law in the country. Yes, the same Reagan that conservatives put on a pedestal as a paragon of conservative values. Yes, the same NRA that lobbies congress to relax gun control laws in the wake of school shootings.
It’s because people realized that peaceful unarmed protests got violently busted by cops, but peaceful armed protests were politely watched from across the street. When lawmakers saw a bunch of armed black people on their front doorstep and saw the police were totally unwilling to stop them, they got really fucking sweaty really fucking fast. And so the Mulford Act was born, as an attempt to strip black people of their guns and prevent them from organizing armed protests.
Everybody hard and wet over all these guns until they get in the hands of the marginalized.
“Oh, people using the 2nd amendment how it was meant to be used? Can’t have that, nope. Get that constitution out of my face. Fuck the constitution.” - Americans
Commenting, as always, to say that's not how the 2A was meant to be used. That's a modern interpretation. Read it for yourself. It's clearly talking about having militias ready to fight an invading country, as was standard practice at the time. Standing professional armies were unusual, especially for newly formed small nations.
Well I just think that whole part about “being necessary to the security of a free State” could be speaking about foreign or domestic threats.
And god fucking damn it I can’t find a SINGLE useful webpage on the original text of the 2nd amendment. Fuckin’ pissing me off lmao I swear this happens any time I try to find something about the constitution, it’s a god damned mess lol
Really? This is the site for amendments (for now at least). It's the second result when I search. Second to Wikipedia.
I can see the argument for what you said, but it pretty clearly isn't the primary reason, looking back with a historical lense. It also specifically says "well regulated militia" which definitely does not refer to people with no training who never use their weapon having one in their house. Usually a militia would store their weapons in a central place and would also train to be ready when called. The individual storage and ownership thing is not the expectation historically.
I see, thanks for explaining. And for the link.
But since we’re talking about Black Panthers, don’t they meet the criteria for being a militia? That’s what I was referring to in my original comment.
It depends on the definition, but not really. Pretty much every definition is an army of citizens the state can call into service when needed. It isn't just an organized group of armed people.
Man these dudes be lookin dope. Can you people in burgerland bring them back, i think you need em.
Socialist RA movements are trying.
Would you say more? DM if that's better.
Stands for Socialist Rifle Association. https://socialistra.org/
I don’t know much about them, just thought I’d point you in that direction 🫡
The one in my area disbanded :(
): Why?
Honestly I'm not really sure. Never found out why, and I'm having a very hard time trying to find any other leftist, or even just progressive, gun club.
Black Panthers. The reason republicans embraced gun control.
That shotgun looks no-nonsense as fuck.
It's a riot gun- short barrel, long magazine. I'm pretty sure it's this model, specifically
...and the fucking racist GOP loser Ronnie Reagan kicked off California's gun control laws.
This is why when everyone says "the civil rights movement was peaceful" I laugh. Yeah it was peaceful with a strong demonstrated threat of violent uprising, it would have never succeeded or have been half-assed "concessions" without Malcolm X and the black panthers.
Most of the civil rights movements greatest successes were before Black Panthers even existed, much less gained prominence. Your broader point is correct, though. "A riot is the language of the unheard", as Dr. King said.
There were a LOT of armed protestors who specifically hung around the unarmed protestors, or gave them shelter when they had to flee their protests. The Deacons are one good example.
See the book "This Nonviolent Stuff Will Get You Killed" for more info. A lot of the armed nonviolent movement got pushed to the side and diminished by later histories because it's inconvenient and uncomfortable for a lot of people to think of "Yes I don't wish to do violence, that's why I'm armed and train with my weapon every weekend."
See the book “This Nonviolent Stuff Will Get You Killed” for more info. A lot of the armed nonviolent movement got pushed to the side and diminished by later histories because it’s inconvenient and uncomfortable for a lot of people to think of “Yes I don’t wish to do violence, that’s why I’m armed and train with my weapon every weekend.”
"Si vis pacem, para bellum."
All major events are negotiations, and negotiations are performed in the lens of relative power. If someone has the power to smash your face in, and you have no power to retaliate, whatever the stakes, the opposition is at an advantage - even if they don't actually smash your face in.
If you find a way to retaliate in kind, even if you don't end up exercising that retaliation, you change the balance of power - and the course of the negotiations.
The tricky part is matching that with PR concerns and avoiding bait.
✊
I cannot stress this enough, protest with guns. Best way to do it.