this post was submitted on 25 Feb 2025
339 points (98.8% liked)

News

25462 readers
4830 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

A leaked State Department document revealed plans for a $400 million contract potentially favoring Tesla, despite earlier denials.

The document indicated an aggressive bid for armored electric vehicles linked to Trump-era revisions, while Biden’s administration had only budgeted $483,000 for a related study.

Experts questioned the feasibility of using Tesla’s Cybertruck due to technical and safety issues, with Musk and the White House downplaying the deal.

Critics and security professionals expressed skepticism about replacing traditional armored vehicles with modified EVs.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 14 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Yep, Democrats had 4 years to lock the guy up, and they didn't, because it was more important to look bipartisan and pick a Republican AG.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 days ago (3 children)

I mean, are we blaming now the democrats for everything trump does?

There's at least two entities I would put more blame on:

-trump

-republicans

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The Republicans are definitely the primary party to blame, but the Dems have to take some blame to for failing to do their job and fucking stop them.

It's like if there's an intruder in your house that robs you blind and shoots your partner, and the cops show up 8 hours later, take a report, and do literally nothing else, and act like you're inconveniencing them the whole time. Sure, your primary problem is the burglar, but I'm guessing you won't have a high opinion of the cops either.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

100% with you, but see even in other responses to my comment, many people just skip the burglar entirely and just blame the cops.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Because nobody's got the expectation that Republicans will do anything good. They campaigned on being assholes, so there's no point in circlejerking about how terrible they are, we all know.

Democrats knew that Trump was going to be a danger to democracy, campaigned on it even, but didn't do anything to facilitate locking him up because they were too busy trying to be bipartisan.

Trump has literally done 100s of crimes that are all well documented in the press, and they fumbled it. Can we please just criticise them for that? And their continued failing to be a proper opposition party?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

They deserve criticism all right, but I only see criticism of democrats. Same with Gaza before the election. A casual observer will see the discourse and think that democrats really are awful, better vote for the other guy (yeah, the ethnic cleansing one).

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The article and this thread is full of criticism of the Republicans, it's literally about a conflict of interest.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

And the comments are "why did the democrats allow this?"

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Because this is about what we expect from Republicans at this point. It feels like there's no point in going on about how terrible the Republicans are anymore; everybody knows.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago

I disagree, many people are unaware and just hear conversations about it. You see plenty of people with the "both sides" argument even here on lemmy.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Republicans are basically like rabid dogs. They're going to do the predictable thing of fascism. Democrats are the ones that refused to put it down when they had a chance and instead tried to reason with it.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 days ago
[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

It's definitely on the justice department for not executing a seditious traitor.

Also, Biden could have just shot Trump in the face and suffered no legal consequences.