this post was submitted on 27 Feb 2025
23 points (92.6% liked)

MapleResistance

82 readers
13 users here now

For discussion of contingency planning and non-violent resistance to the sudden emergent imperialism. See also: [email protected] [email protected]

founded 1 week ago
MODERATORS
 

What products are most at risk. What are easiest to replace to reduce risk? Hardest to replace?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

The cell phone network might be a day 0 target, but Cell phones would be left mostly untouched, they are easy to track/drone strike. Interference would only happen acutely for IED concerns or cqb operations

GPS/Satellite location would be jammed / disabled

Internet connections would be targeted, sea cables, microwave, etc

Electrical systems would be targeted.

Prioritize:

  • electrical backups
  • clean water backups
  • communication backups (point to point fiber, lasers, microwave)
[–] troyunrau 6 points 4 days ago (3 children)

cell phone network

Oddly enough, there was a huge push a while back to prevent Huawei being used in the cell phone network as infrastructure, because it gave China a potential espionage route. No one was thinking "kill switch" during this discussion. And no one was considering US tech in this discussion as a risk either.

I wonder what percentage of Canadian cell phone infrastructure is American?

[–] Auli 2 points 3 days ago

What about network switches I'm guessing Cisco.

[–] phanto 3 points 4 days ago

Most of the Huawei stuff got replaced with Nokia stuff, in Western Canada.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

In a invasion we don't have to think about software kill switches, each tower can be trivially destroyed.

[–] troyunrau 4 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I suppose I was presuming they wanted the infrastructure intact. Probably easier to shut off the power than to destroy the dam. But this all presumes they're acting rationally. Invading Canada isn't rational, so everything else is a question mark too.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago

Cell phone towers are not critical infrastructure, destroying them is just the cost of war.

Hydroelectric dams, nuclear power plants, anything that takes a long time to build, would be spared if the intent is to takeover.

Off the cuff invasion scenario:

  1. Jam all gps
  2. Multistike all air force and anti air installations
  3. Emp over military facilities
  4. Destroy key communication points
  5. Destroy power grid
  6. Mine all major roads (cluster mines from the air)
  7. Secure /disable nuclear assets

Cut the population off so they can't organize, destroy the military, secure critical assets. Since most of the CA population lives within 100km of the boarder the only real pernicious worry will be submarines deployed and further afield military posts in the north.