this post was submitted on 27 Feb 2025
13 points (93.3% liked)

Privacy

34309 readers
1888 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Because it's kind of hard! Even if I follow their instructions. Maybe I'm just dumb . . . 🙁

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Depending on your threat model, not very important. What are the chances that 1) someone will have hacked Mullvad’s server and installed a compromised version of the browser, and 2) you happen to download the compromised version before the hack is discovered and mitigated? ~~Also, the signature and the package appear to be on the same server, so what’s necessarily going to stop the hacker from updating the signature to match their hacked package?~~ [Edit: It’s a GPG signature, not a simple hash signature, so I guess that’s so not trivial after all.]

[–] [email protected] 4 points 22 hours ago

Right. The risk is low, but nonzero.

You'll want to make sure that the key you're validating is provided through another trusted channel, so that an attacker can't provide a bad download and have you check it against their bad key too.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

That's kind of what I figured, although after following Mullvad Browser's instructions for verification, I did get two different RSA keys, if that means anything . . .