this post was submitted on 27 Feb 2025
281 points (99.6% liked)

politics

20474 readers
3588 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Elon Musk has tentatively agreed to appear on "The Daily Show" for an unedited interview with Jon Stewart, who recently criticized DOGE's federal workforce cuts so passionately he injured his hand during a segment.

Stewart condemned Musk's approach to government efficiency, arguing against indiscriminate firing of federal employees.

The show officially accepted Musk's condition for an unedited appearance.

Despite controversy over Musk's recent email demanding employees justify their jobs, Trump reaffirmed support for Musk at his first Cabinet meeting.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 26 points 19 hours ago (5 children)

This is a make-or-break moment for Stewart, because if he ever shows any sort of complacency with Musk when he's face-to-face with the sonofabitch, when he's so passionately against him when he's not, as talk show hosts often do with controversial guests, his audience will punish him something fierce.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Make or break?

Uh, the dude already made it... He was staple viewing for college kids of my generation and a lone voice of sanity on corporate television during the Bush years

[–] [email protected] 14 points 11 hours ago

I grew up watching TDS at like 9 or 10. My family was pretty openly liberal, they found the jokes funny, and he integrated into my life on a daily basis for years, especially during the Bush years when I was a young teen.

His work with veterans and 9/11 responders solidified Jon as not just a talker but a real community builder.

Jon’s done countless hot interviews and regularly came out ahead. Jon would have no issue challenging power: he never has. That’s his charisma and charm.

Totally agree with the poster above.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 11 hours ago

“Make or break?” Jon Stewart is on what is essentially the victory tour of his career. He was so popular in his first stint at the daily show that some openly wondered whether the show could continue without him. He retired from that to work advocacy for first responders, for which he was lauded. He’s back now because even a solid decade away couldn’t make the audience forget his heyday. I’ve criticized Stewart in the past, but even I can see that if he were to flub this interview most would shrug “huh, sad how the greats start to slip as they age,” and tune back in next week.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

You don't really know much about Stewart do you?

[–] [email protected] -3 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (2 children)

I know all there is to know about Stewart, and I'm 99% certain he won't go easy with Musk. All I'm saying is, if it ever dares do that, I and all the folks who know him will hate his guts.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

You just created an extremely unlikely hypothetical to get upset at … why?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 hour ago

To setup this thread for his alt account, obviously.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (2 children)

He will go easy, he won't go at him like people want him to. He's interviewing Musk and there will be a level of decorum and respect because that's what adults do. But the left are such rabid idealists that they won't accept that. But most importantly the right leaning groups will help nudge it along as they always do with fake accounts and memes pretending to be left leaning.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Do you just not remember him tearing into Bill O'Reilly? He's destroyed people before, why do you think he wouldn't try to destroy Musk too?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 hours ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 hours ago

Is this from you several years ago just being angry that he gave Bill a platform? Nothing in there says he went easy on him, and in fact there's plenty of commenters repeating my point that he kicked Bill's ass and it was great television.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Stewart will relish the chance to embarrass Musk

[–] [email protected] -4 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

No, he won’t. He’ll have a conversation, keep it entertaining, but there’s no chance he makes him look like an ass. Then, the next day, you and others will be here tearing Stewart apart for the rest of the year. Eventually, he’ll say, "Fuck this," and shift his political views after realizing just how toxic and ineffective the left is, how quick they are to turn on their own, just like so many before him have.

The left has the energy of a narcissistic ex-girlfriend, full of hopes and dreams, but the moment you show even the slightest rejection of their principles, they unleash the most savage, vicious abuse.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Stewart is the master of faux, formal politeness. Yes it's sometimes annoying. He would be way too nice to some Republicans but I think he respecter them actually sitting down on his show. Stewart isn't as far left as I am, but he is capable of asking tough questions. His Jim Cramer sit-down is masterful preparation and execution by a team of researchers who brought receipts. He would not have been polite to Dick Cheney or Bush either

I think now as he's gotten older, he's even less likely to let guys like Musk slide on their bullshit. I have faith in his personal integrity. He's got a good body of work.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 hours ago

Him getting older will be the opposite. He'll have a more respectful approach. Smart intelligent people don't hold onto hate the way a lot of people do. He'll have a conversation. People will hate him

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

How can you claim to know the future with such certainty? It comes across silly.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (1 children)

Because of all the other times I've done it. Can you not predict the way trump supporters will act. You can't see the forest when you're standing in the middle of it but everyone else can see it that are standing outside of it

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (1 children)

No. I can guess how some of them will react, but not exactly what everyone will do with specific timing and details lol. Claiming you know with any certainty what people will do, let alone everyone in a group of people, is naive and small minded.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 hour ago

You're just arguing to be right. We all know what they'll do. Likewise we know what the left will do.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (2 children)

I’m not hugely versed on American show hosts, but that would seem very out of character for Stewart who seems a bit more earnest than the usual from what little I know.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

It's very common for hosts - hell, anybody - to be vitriolic with someone who isn't there in person, and then become all civil, polite and buddy-buddy-like with them when they're around. For example, Bill Maher recently invited that turd Matt Gaetz on his podcast show thing and it was the most nauseating best-friends act you never saw, considering how critical Maher has been of the guy.

Oh this disgusting scene that shows in no uncertain way that all politicians are in fact in the same club of psychopaths, and their public rivalries are just theater.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

John has had some pretty direct and confrontational interviews already. This wouldn't be new for him.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 15 hours ago

Part of his brand is that he is authentic in his beliefs. He also has had numerous people on in the past that he did not like personally but was able to have a civil conversation with. I think John could run for president and win but I also think he doesn't want the headaches or he would have done it already.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

I just came to say this. There is no tolerance. Jon Stewart is going to get crucified and pushed to either quit or he will have such a disgust from the reaction that he'll end up hating the left. He's too good at what he does. Any effective communicator must be purged no exceptions