this post was submitted on 28 Feb 2025
265 points (98.5% liked)

World News

41380 readers
5391 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

During an Oval Office meeting with British PM Keir Starmer, Trump walked back his recent criticism of Ukrainian President Zelensky, responding "Did I say that? I can't believe I said that" when asked if he still considered Zelensky a "dictator."

Trump claimed to have a "very good relationship" with Zelensky despite last week calling him a "dictator without elections" and suggesting he shouldn't participate in peace negotiations.

Starmer corrected Trump's claim that European aid to Ukraine was all loans, noting much was "gifted."

Zelensky is scheduled to visit the White House on February 28 to finalize a critical minerals agreement.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Vance is a bigger threat IMO than Trump tbh. The weird stuff with him, Thiel, Yarvin, and the Dark Enlightment stuff is all terrifying.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Maybe but he's not as, I'm gonna say "charismatic", though. Maga love Trump himself, not his policy. It's a cult of personality. Trump could turn on Vance and nobody would care.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

yeah I agree with you there. The risk tho is if Vance becomes President he could probably mess up a whole lot of things quickly in line with their dark enlightenment insanity.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

True. It would be a gamble.. Would the less crazy fringe of the Republican congress go along with Vance if daddy Trump isn't there to protect him though? I don't know. A lot of conservatives don't really like Trump but they're too afraid of the power he wields over them. It's possible that would all collapse with Trump's absence. Unfortunately I think Elon could provide a replacement celebrity to rally around.. He brings his own f'ing cult.

What a fuckin' mess.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 21 hours ago

FUBAR. That's what it is.

sigh

[–] Someone 1 points 18 hours ago

I'll admit I don't know much about him, especially being effectively relegated to assistant-vice-president, but I feel like he'd be a bit more stable foreign policy wise. Not necessarily better, but as a Canadian I think I'd sleep better with him as president than what we've got now.

[–] BlemboTheThird 1 points 22 hours ago

The issue there is Trump already won the election. I'm not sure enough people would turn on Vance if he had some legitimate claim to power