this post was submitted on 28 Feb 2025
448 points (96.5% liked)

Gaming

3792 readers
704 users here now

!gaming is a community for gaming noobs through gaming aficionados. Unlike !games, we don’t take ourselves quite as serious. Shitposts and memes are welcome.

Our Rules:

1. Keep it civil.


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only.


2. No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia or any other flavor of bigotry.


I should not need to explain this one.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Try not to repost anything posted within the past month.


Beyond that, go for it. Not everyone is on every site all the time.



Logo uses joystick by liftarn

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Couldn't disagree more. Immersion comes from the details, not the fidelity. I was told to expect this incredibly immersive experience form RDR2 and then I got:

  • carving up animals is frequently wonky
  • gun cleaning is just autopilot wiping the exterior of a gun
  • shaving might as well be done off-screen
  • you transport things on your horse without tying them down

Yeah that didn't do it for me.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

realism and visual fidelity are two slightly overlapping but different things.

a game can have great graphics but its npcs be unrealistic bullet sponges. cp2077 comes to mind, not that this makes it a bad game necessarily.

i dont actually want to go to the bathroom in-game but i love me some well written story, graphics can help immensely with that. among other things.

come to think of it 100% realist games would probably be boring